• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Somerset now under water

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by tarbera View Post
    There own fault for building farms on a flood plain then !!!!
    I do wonder if you realise that food doesn't actually grow in the refrigerators in tesco.

    Like the slopes of a volcano, the soil tends to be very fertile on a flood plain, flat land is much easier to work, and of course you need to be near fresh water if you plan to grow crops. That's why you don't see a whole lot of arable farms at the top of mountains and other flood resistant places.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
      There were TEN THOUSAND homes in Gloucestershire and Worcestershire flooded in 2007. There are fewer than 50 after weeks more rain than then.

      Whole villages in the East Midlands flooded in 2003 haven't been touched at all in these floods.

      If you want to jump on the Bash the EA bandwagon, then go right ahead.
      "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
      - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by doodab View Post
        That's why you don't see a whole lot of arable farms at the top of mountains and other flood resistant places.
        You don't see a whole lot of arable farms on the levels either. Probably about 20%. Most of it permanent pasture for grasskeep and grazing.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by tarbera View Post
          There own fault for building farms on a flood plain then !!!!

          That's like 1 house on the Thames value, Somerset should be abandoned to save London.
          Although it's all flooding, there are two very different problems going on here, neither of which has a solution for an acceptable amount of tax-payer's cash, and neither of which have much to do with dredging (well the dredging that the EA control, as ASB pointed out)

          Dredging is a political football, as is the EA at the moment, and whilst many criticisms could be aimed, they shouldn't be aimed by the likes of that imbecile Eric Pickles

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Bacchus View Post
            ah, the twisted ramblings of a loser who can't afford a house by the river!
            I think I read somewhere that Berks had to borrow a pump because they had lent theirs to Somerset. Oopsy.

            Comment


              #26
              ???

              Originally posted by doodab View Post
              I do wonder if you realise that food doesn't actually grow in the refrigerators in tesco.

              Like the slopes of a volcano, the soil tends to be very fertile on a flood plain, flat land is much easier to work, and of course you need to be near fresh water if you plan to grow crops. That's why you don't see a whole lot of arable farms at the top of mountains and other flood resistant places.
              It will actually save money, government is probably paying them large subsidies not to grow anything anyway.

              Won't get any action until anything serious is flooded

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by tarbera View Post
                It will actually save money, government is probably paying them large subsidies not to grow anything anyway.
                What will save money? Doing **** all? It might save a little bit I suppose but it's going to piss people off.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by tarbera View Post
                  It will actually save money, government is probably paying them large subsidies not to grow anything anyway.

                  Won't get any action until anything serious is flooded
                  You are amazingly well up to date as to how the subsidy schemes work.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Thankyou

                    Originally posted by ASB View Post
                    You are amazingly well up to date as to how the subsidy schemes work.
                    It is fat farmers in land rovers that are millionaires getting my tax money to fill there fat faces with pie ?

                    I see one fat farmer might need to come back from the Caribbean to tend his flock

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by tarbera View Post
                      It is fat farmers in land rovers that are millionaires getting my tax money to fill there fat faces with pie ?

                      I see one fat farmer might need to come back from the Caribbean to tend his flock
                      That is a completely different thing. That is, in effect, a statement that you do not approve of subsidies. That is absolutely fine (and something I largely agree with).

                      However, what you said was rather different. If was:-

                      "It will actually save money, government is probably paying them large subsidies not to grow anything anyway."

                      As I said, the statement is bollocks and demonstrate you have approximately zero knowledge of any of the system you are so robustly criticising.

                      The SPS replaced all production/set aside schemes in the substantial CAP overhaul back in 2005. Can't remember the rates since I had to go through a fairly major registration exercise, but if I recall correctly it ended up being about 20 quid a hectare.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X