Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostPG used it in a context where he clearly knew what it meant, and it was very offensive. Sas used it like a kid in the playground, then apologised, asked to be banned, and in the same post as his apology used it again. PC used it in response to sas's post, and is clearly just a prize pillock.Last edited by eek; 6 May 2014, 18:48.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostBut we are allowed to say norks, right?Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostDowesn't it depend on font size and colour? I remember someone got banned for those reasons so Churchill started small in black and got larger and more colourful until he got banned.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by eek View Postmeh.... But see my comment above, its the inconsistency I dislike here
One would expect the same moderator could manage consistency with themselves in the same thread, though.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf you want continuity of moderation, you're on the wrong forum.
One would expect the same moderator could manage consistency with themselves in the same thread, though.
Bring back realityhack and scotspine.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostHow come psychocandy isn't banned for the same offence..... At least Sas discovered why it was wrong and apologised....
BTW- sorry wasnt aware of association with downs.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNo, Three people used a particular word, two people have been banned for doing so, 1 hasn't....
While PC should be perma-banned for being a muppet (see Brillo's bankruptcy thread) and bringing contracting into disrepute (every other post he's made), that isn't my current annoyance with him remaining on the forum....Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSorry to interrupt the thread - but I don't want PC banned. And I think I should have a say in it.
He apologized and, IMO, thats the end of it.
Apologies - please get back to arguing.
OK mods. Fair enough I guess a ban is in order....Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Yesterday 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Dec 3 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment