• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Another Zionist Actress - quits supporting Oxfam

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
    Oxfam is a fake charity anyway. Majority funded by government, and a major lobbyer
    Home government institutions provide 203.4 million Euros to Oxfam in the past year where accounts are available.

    That's out of a total income of 955.9 million Euros, so 21%

    Not quite a majority.

    Even if you consider all institutional fundraising as government funding, that accounts for 412.3 million Euros, or 43% of total income.

    Source - see page 68
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      WGAF anyway, she is a complete fantasy ride.
      You would too, then.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        You would too, then.
        oh $Diety YES!

        Comment


          #14
          yes lets provide more division because a non military company based in a disputed area is happily employing both sides and treating them officially as equals.

          The lure of the cash won out over helping a charity then?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            You would too, then.
            Till the baby pushed me off.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              You would too, then.
              Originally posted by vetran View Post
              oh $Diety YES!
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              Till the baby pushed me off.
              Good. If these three posters who rarely agree on anything can agree on that, I think we've solved the middle east conflict. We clone Scarlett Johansson and send one example to every heterosexual male in the middle east. Oh wait, we'll send some to the gay guys as well and they can make the tea.

              Sorted!

              (there is a serious point to this; I wonder if sexual frustration might be a factor in some religious violence)
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                yes lets provide more division because a non military company based in a disputed area is happily employing both sides and treating them officially as equals.

                The lure of the cash won out over helping a charity then?
                1) If it were your home being bulldozed I think you would beg to differ
                2) There is a difference between employment and subjugation/exploitation.
                3) I would dispute whether being treated as a 2nd class citizens without any human rights/dignity and having no option but to work for an oppressive regime is being treated equally.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                  2) There is a difference between employment and subjugation/exploitation.
                  1 and 3 are relevant but on point 2; do you have the salary information available for that factory?
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    1 and 3 are relevant but on point 2; do you have the salary information available for that factory?
                    No I don't and quite frankly, given the facts I wouldn't bother to go and get them.

                    Just look at the facts when it comes to distribution of water between Palestinians and Israelis and the peanut salaries other Palestinian workers are on (non-Israeli arabs that is). You think if they have no human rights when it comes to housing, land, water that a more advanced human right (employment rights) will suddenly be by our western standards?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                      No I don't and quite frankly, given the facts I wouldn't bother to go and get them.
                      ?
                      The CEO was on the telly this morning saying his Palestinian employees are paid the same as Israeli Jewish employees and Israeli Arab employees; why don't you provide evidence if you don't think that's true?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X