Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No I would not have more options - I would in fact have fewer: when driving next to hard shoulder that is empty I always got safe lane to drive into should anything happen, like say my tyre burst or engine failure.
IF it's empty. If not, then WHAM !
Originally posted by AtW
55-60mph save about 20-25% of fuel too - I can get 700 mph out of one tank of fuel.
700 mph out of one tankful ? Maybe if you fired a flaregun into it.
Its almost always empty - if its not then I just continue driving, I can only have problems IF hard shoulder is not empty AND someone in right lane gets problems, probability of these TWO events are next to zero, thankfully because drivers in this country are civilised and don't even use hard shoulder when everyone is stuck in jam, in Russia hard shoulders are used like all the time, very bad.
Its almost always empty - if its not then I just continue driving, I can only have problems IF hard shoulder is not empty AND someone in right lane gets problems, probability of these TWO events are next to zero, thankfully because drivers in this country are civilised and don't even use hard shoulder when everyone is stuck in jam, in Russia hard shoulders are used like all the time, very bad.
Ah yeah, the probability may be less but the severity will be much more. If you have engine failure travelling at 60 you will still be travelling at 50 when you hit the Artic parked up in the hard shoulder - and of course you will be nearest to the impact. If something shunts you up the rear as you swerve into the outside lane then it's going to be maybe a 20mph impact and you will be furthest from the impact point. Also if you get shunted the car behind you protects you from further impact, which certainly doesn't happen if you hit something stationary.
Ergo.. it is always better to have a shunt in the rear.
Ah yeah, the probability may be less but the severity will be much more. If you have engine failure travelling at 60 you will still be travelling at 50 when you hit the Artic parked up in the hard shoulder
Did you see what I said? This event would require TWO very unlikely events to happen at the same time! Say if probability of engine failure in my car is 0.001 (assumed), and probability of car being on hard shoulder in exactly same spot is 0.001 (also assumed), then probability of BOTH events occuring at the same time is... 0.001 * 0.001 = 0.000001
Lets suppose probability of engine failure is 1 - it will certainly fail, then at 60 mph I will need around 50 meters to stop the car. When I drive on motorway I usually see car on hard shoulder no more often than 10 miles, which is 16000 meters, so, its 50/16000 or probability of 0.003125 that a car will be on hard shoulder when my engine failed.
Now what are the chance of (good diesel) engines failure? Lets generously say that 1 out of 100 such engines fail, so overall probability is 0.01 * 0.003125 or 0.00003125, which is 1 in 32,000 journeys or 16,000 days without such risk (assuming two jouirneys per day), which is 44 years.
Now the engine's failure probability is IMO much less than 0.01, do the math yourself to see its even less likely.
More importantly - its all relative, where would you prefer your engine to fail - in high speed lane or next to the hard shoulder? In case of high speed lane it would mean that you have high speed cars around you, so probabilty of a car hit is almost certain instead of 0.003125.
Comment