• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Coming over here, taking our jobs...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Or reduce population growth. Oh look an elephant in the room!
    The population of London is lower than it was in 1939, yet house prices have gone up in real terms. Economic growth in London demands more workers.


    How much population growth would you like to see (in London or the UK)?

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
      The population of London is lower than it was in 1939, yet house prices have gone up in real terms. Economic growth in London demands more workers.


      How much population growth would you like to see (in London or the UK)?
      Well if you want to go back to the slums of London with people packed in like Sardines then fine. I'm quite happy with it to stay static.

      London's population over time | Poverty Indicators | London's Poverty Report

      Economic growth doesn't demand more workers in London unless you are building factories.

      UK population: how will it change over the next few decades? | News | theguardian.com

      There are plenty of areas outside London with Brownfield sites, we need to spread business out across the UK.
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by vetran View Post
        Well if you want to go back to the slums of London with people packed in like Sardines then fine. I'm quite happy with it to stay static.[/url]
        I want to extend the Green Belt. I've already said that. If you want a static population, how will you encourage people to leave as the population ages?

        Originally posted by vetran View Post
        Economic growth doesn't demand more workers in London unless you are building factories.
        Do you believe that manufacturing is the main driver of economic growth in London?

        Originally posted by vetran View Post
        There are plenty of areas outside London with Brownfield sites, we need to spread business out across the UK.
        London is a world city. By one categorisation, it is one of two alpha++ cities, along with NYC. Global city - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        Do you think we can spread business around the UK? Do you think that new or growing businesses, where the potential for economic growth lies, are choosing between London and Birmingham, or between London and New York (or Singapore etc.)?

        London is where the action is and it is an expensive place to live, and always will be. However, the cost of living can be reduced by extending the green belt.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
          I want to extend the Green Belt. I've already said that. If you want a static population, how will you encourage people to leave as the population ages?



          Do you believe that manufacturing is the main driver of economic growth in London?



          London is a world city. By one categorisation, it is one of two alpha++ cities, along with NYC. Global city - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

          Do you think we can spread business around the UK? Do you think that new or growing businesses, where the potential for economic growth lies, are choosing between London and Birmingham, or between London and New York (or Singapore etc.)?

          London is where the action is and it is an expensive place to live, and always will be. However, the cost of living can be reduced by extending the green belt.

          Why not aspire to Birmingham, Manchester & Glasgow becoming Alpha or Alpha+ cities?

          We don't have a lot of green belt in Global terms, why not diversify and build the rest of the country rather than packing everything into one city.

          If your argument is working population should go up in London lets remove housing benefit and let the city pay for its own accommodation?
          Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            Why not aspire to Birmingham, Manchester & Glasgow becoming Alpha or Alpha+ cities?

            We don't have a lot of green belt in Global terms, why not diversify and build the rest of the country rather than packing everything into one city.

            If your argument is working population should go up in London lets remove housing benefit and let the city pay for its own accommodation?
            Perhaps taxes from London already pay for housing benefit?

            We could aspire to all sorts of things but it's difficult to plan a world city with London on the doorstep. Why not just extend the green belt?

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              Perhaps taxes from London already pay for housing benefit?

              We could aspire to all sorts of things but it's difficult to plan a world city with London on the doorstep. Why not just extend the green belt?
              Well if we pay less housing benefit for expensive London by creating work elsewhere and moving people then maybe London can pay less tax?

              Washington, LA & San Francisco managed it! Miami, Boston & Dallas are pretty keen.

              Because once we have expanded to the green belt we can't get it back.

              Why build down south when we have empty houses and brown field sites up north?
              Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                Well if we pay less housing benefit for expensive London by creating work elsewhere and moving people then maybe London can pay less tax?

                Washington, LA & San Francisco managed it! Miami, Boston & Dallas are pretty keen.

                Because once we have expanded to the green belt we can't get it back.

                Why build down south when we have empty houses and brown field sites up north?
                USA has five times to population of the UK. It's really hard to see how you can 'create work' elsewhere. The businesses are just going to move to other world cities. I wish it wasn't so.

                The this with the green belt, is we create a new green belt. We shouldn't be bound by generations old planning decisions.

                Comment

                Working...
                X