Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Blimey! This is scary...
Collapse
X
-
-
A bit more on costs from a 2009 study for laparscopic appendectomy:
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Data were collected prospectively on patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy within Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust. Theatre and bed costs were obtained. Cost analysis was performed, and costs were compared to the re-imbursement due.
RESULTS
Fifty laparoscopic appendicectomies were performed. Median operative time was 60 min. The median total operative cost of laparoscopic appendicectomy was £906. Median equipment cost for laparoscopically completed cases was £254. Median total in-patient cost was £1617 (range, £880–£3360). This compared with a mean re-imbursement of £1981 representing a cost benefit of £233 per case (P = 0.0009).Comment
-
More reasons why my plan B is not targeting UK hospitals and medical device companiesOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
What this link does not say is how much of this is profit. Granted quite a lot probably, but it would be interesting to know what are the costs for the hospital.
If it is excessively profitable then why aren't competitors coming into the market and driving down the prices? Because of goverment/state regulations creating a barrier to entry perhaps?Comment
-
So what we're saying is that the NHS is actually really good and cost effective? That does deserve a Blimey!
(Of course the large number of immigrants they hire must help keep the costs down).Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Everything in the US medical world is dramatically, terrifyingly expensive... surgeons earn loads, single use medical devices run into the tens of thousands of dollars, hospitals have armies of lawyers and expect to be sued constantly.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostSo what we're saying is that the NHS is actually really good and cost effective? That does deserve a Blimey!
(Of course the large number of immigrants they hire must help keep the costs down).Comment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View Post... hospitals have armies of lawyers and expect to be sued constantly.
If they introduced strictly limited liability, the costs would plummet without having to worry about Obamacare (which sounds like a massive step backwards)Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe person in this case had medical insurance. They still had to pay $11k... that's the part I don't really understand, the whole point of insurance is to cover you. That extra $11k doesn't make a massive difference to the insurance company but it does to a typical person having to potentially take time off work on top of everything else.
Spring time is always amusing, the Arabs arrive in München in there droves on a medical holiday of sorts."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
I also find it odd that the NHS gives all treatment for free, and prescriptions are a fixed cost, but dental has surcharges. You can have any disease and treatment costs you a tenner a month (you can get a prescription pre-payment card), but if you have bad teeth you can have to spend £thousands... the top tier of treatments isn't for vanity procedures either but things you might actually need doing. £300 or whatever it is is a lot of money to a median wage slave; heck even the middle band of £50ish isn't exactly trivial.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment