• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bring back John Major

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I think you're suggesting a super-state, but why a socialist super-state?
    A union isn't necessarily a super state. The African Union is not a super state and neither is the Union of South American Nations. They are, however, increasingly important economic organisations with which any country wanting to trade with their members may have to negotiate in future.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      No, that doesn't answer the question. Who says the EU aims to create a socialist super state?
      Why is a Marxist the president of the European Commission ?
      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        But to state that a regime is statist and authoritarian does not make it socialist. Was the Shah of Iran a socialist?

        Equally there are socialists that are not or authoritarian.

        So can we have some clear thinking please? Why is the EU socialist?
        You can split hairs as much as you like but you will find that any sytem that has become statist and grown larger in its quest has followed a socialist agenda. In order for statism to grow the people have to surrender their individual freedoms to state control. Statism means state control of industries which means preventing smaller entrepreneurial enterprises from competing. More often than not statism can only exist if it is backed by authoritarian control.

        The only reason that there may be socialists who are not in control is simply because they are not yet in power. You will however find that "statist" style organisations (monopolies) exist under some sort of "collective" control (trade unions).

        Whilst the EU is without doubt seemingly supportive of business (the row over the UK governments doling out of Nuclear contracts being a prime example) it is on a mission to gather ever more power and control. Its laws and diktats are largely designed to kill off small businesses because only the larg corporates can afford to comply with regulations. even though banks, energy companies and transport organisations are privately owned they are in effect monopolies. With more and more regulation these will eventually be subsumed into the EU socialist empire.

        If you look at China on the other hand the reverse is happening (and if you saw the program on Cuba last night - a perfect example of the same process in reverse). Power is being relinquished from the state.

        These sorts of changes do not happen overnight but the direction is going firmly leftwards.
        Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          A union isn't necessarily a super state. The African Union is not a super state and neither is the Union of South American Nations. They are, however, increasingly important economic organisations with which any country wanting to trade with their members may have to negotiate in future.
          The European Union would do well to copy them.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
            Why is a Marxist the president of the European Commission ?
            Because he isn't a Marxist. He joined a Maoist student groupd when he was at college and probably off his head, and at a time that the socialist opposition were actually the only powerful group fighting the Estado Novo regime of Salazar.

            Anyway, even if Barroso is still a Marxist, how does that make the aim of the EU a socialist super state? Will Barroso always get his way?
            Last edited by Mich the Tester; 2 December 2013, 13:49.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
              The European Union would do well to copy them.
              I agree in so far as those organisations are primarily about free trade and removing unnecessary border formalities.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                You can split hairs as much as you like but you will find that any sytem that has become statist and grown larger in its quest has followed a socialist agenda.
                So if I find one that hasn't followed a socialist agenda, you are wrong?

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                  So if I find one that hasn't followed a socialist agenda, you are wrong?
                  Wot, like the British Empire? Did that become socialist?

                  Was the Roman Empire socialist?

                  What about Genghis Khan's Mongol Empire? Just a bunch of Islington lefties?
                  Last edited by Mich the Tester; 2 December 2013, 13:56.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    What about Genghis Khan's Mongol Empire? Just a bunch of Islington lefties?
                    Yes I think they invented the "chai latte".
                    Bunch of raving homosexual leftwing Trotskyite socialists
                    Hard Brexit now!
                    #prayfornodeal

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                      Yes I think they invented the "chai latte".
                      Bunch of raving homosexual leftwing Trotskyite socialists
                      Ha ha! Tag. You're it! Am logging of now and back to work.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X