• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bring back John Major

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The USSR was not socialist. HTH
    Who said that ?
    Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

    No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
      You are entirely missing the point of this debate. It is not about the EU (MTT is broadly pro-, I am anti-). It is about baiting the CUK cretins.
      I am not really 'pro EU'. I am in favour of a European free trade, movement and association area, much like the EC/EEC once was, and without the European Commission and European Parliament. I am opposed to Britain leaving the EU as it stands right now because think the EU is the right means to achieve that at the moment. I don't like the idea of a referendum that asks 'in' or 'out' when there are almost infinite alternatives that can be achieved by negotiating from Britain's current position. It´s not a binary decision.

      But then I think you're capable of understanding non-binary points of view, unlike some people.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        since when was Macmillan a socialist

        I know you are trying desperately to argue the point any way you can but Britain's political system did not allow for Socialism to run its true course. it almost did however when the UK was in the grip of the Trade Unions but thanks to Maggie your friends were kicked out.
        He wasn't. That's my point; Churchill, Adenauer and MacMillan were the driving forces behind the European human rights treaty and none of them were socialists.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          First point; yes, the UK government gives away benefits that it doesn't have to give under EU rules. The EU only stipulates equal access for citizens of member states to contribution based benefits, and even then only after people have paid into the system for some length of time. The UK has been stupid enough to remove the distinction of contribution based and non-contribution based benefits; that was a stupid thing to do and the EU has nothing to do with it. Blame Mr B Liar for that one, or the coalition for failing to change it (as yet).

          Secondly, while I agree that socialists tend to like high taxes (although actually the top rate of income tax in China, Vietnam and Cuba is lower than in the UK), what's this about socialists inhibiting industrial activity? What were all those tractor factories about in the USSR? Well OK, yes, the tractors were perhaps so tulip they just got in the way of the farmers, but they made them.

          Thirdly, no, there will be no 'regardless of debate'; there will be debate about this and it's only just getting started. Do not expect your ideas about the EU to go unchallenged by others. I don't expect my ideas to go unchallenged either.
          The USSR was not socialist. HTH

          Comment


            Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
            Who said that ?
            That was me. HTH

            Comment


              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              The USSR was not socialist. HTH
              Oh OK. So where were the socialist tractor factories?
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
                Well that is a start I guess. But this would imply that Cameron is offering more benefits that he needs to under european rules. I find that hard to believe - he's a tory! (or he was one)
                Read: European Commission in the UK – Euromyths and Letters to the Editor » Blog Archive » Free movement and migration within the EU and rights to claim benefits

                Just in case: Stop mass immigration from Bulgarian and Romanians in 2014, when EU restrictions on immigration are relaxed. - e-petitions

                Is the UK benefits system more generous than those in other EU countries? The systems are very diverse, so comparisons are difficult.
                In terms of total spending on social security per inhabitant, the UK does not rank highest. In the UK the figure for 2010 was nearly 8,000 euros (£6,660; $10,880), the EU statistics agency Eurostat reports. In France and Germany it was nearly 9,000 euros, while in Denmark and the Netherlands it was above 10,000. At the other end of the scale, spending in Bulgaria and Romania was below 2,000 euros.
                Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

                  Thirdly, no, there will be no 'regardless of debate'; there will be debate about this and it's only just getting started. Do not expect your ideas about the EU to go unchallenged by others. I don't expect my ideas to go unchallenged either.
                  No I meant regardless of the debate as to whether the EU was socialist or not...
                  i.e. even if the EU was completely capitalistic I would still not be in favour of it because it is not needed.
                  All we need in Europe is an absence of controls. Laisse faire is the way to go.

                  I welcome debate - even from you Mich

                  Comment


                    Here 'e comes with his bloody facts again. Tut tut, huh.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      Oh OK. So where were the socialist tractor factories?
                      There weren't any.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X