Originally posted by original PM
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Greed is Good!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Definitely the Germans; the Dutch would be too stingey to pay.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
kerist I need to change my name--- not a PM(anymore) and the PM does not stand for Project ManagerOriginally posted by sasguru View PostFeck me I forgot the largest parasites of all: PMs.
Exterminate! Exterminate!

Comment
-
Well done.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostPertaining to the species homo sapiens sapiens.
A case in point is a person born with severe learning disabilities. Should we value them any less than a human being without a learning disability? Or should we decide they are of equal worth?
If the yardstick against which you measure the value of humans is their innate humanity itself, then they are equal. If you disagree with that, then go ahead and explain how you measure the value of such people. If you believe that such an evaluation is logically impossible, don't worry - I still think you're of equal value to the rest of us.Comment
-
Whooossshhhhh!Originally posted by vetran View PostSome gumph.
I suggest you re-read the thread and find out who is arguing for what.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Whoooshhhhhhh!Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostForgive me for mentioning what most will realise is a complete truism; but it doesn't seem at all obvious to people like Sasguru.
Worth is contextual, rather than absolute. In particular, if every supposedly worthless person was eliminated, then a load of people formerly not so would themselves become worthless, and so on.
For example, if every chronically sick person was killed, then Sasguru's skills at totting up pharmaceutical stats would become superfluous and he would be pretty much worthless.
DittoHard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
It's absolutely amazing the insights that you have. I assume that as, typically, you have made vague allusions without any substantive argument it would be an exercise in futility, on my part, to ask you to provide evidence of a simple or even complex concept that I lack the intellectual capability to understand? Unless what you actually mean is that I hold a different opinion from your own and that is enough for you to label me as being of below average intelligence.Originally posted by sasguru View PostYou can't understand complicated concepts. Or even quite simple ones.
And as the world is getting more complex and requires MScs and PhDs, what would you do?Comment
-
You may wish to believe that but it doesn't appear to be true. All other things being equal, more inequality = more problems. This is borne out pretty much anywhere you care to look.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe problems of society are nothing to do with inequality they are to do with lifting the less well off out of poverty.
I don't think it is. You can't address the gap between rich and poor when you ignore one half of the equation.Whilst I agree that too much power and property is indeed concentrated in the hands of too few people I would argue that this is a separate argument.
I would agree that redistribution via the tax system isn't a desirable way to address the problem.Last edited by doodab; 28 November 2013, 15:58.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
You still have not defined worth and nor have you explained what is meant by humanity. You clearly have your own notion of values based presumably around your own somewhat narrow existence and presumably it is this set of values that make up your definition of how equality should be benchmarked. There is however no rule or law or doctrine that says the rest of us should accept your view.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWell done.
A case in point is a person born with severe learning disabilities. Should we value them any less than a human being without a learning disability? Or should we decide they are of equal worth?
If the yardstick against which you measure the value of humans is their innate humanity itself, then they are equal. If you disagree with that, then go ahead and explain how you measure the value of such people. If you believe that such an evaluation is logically impossible, don't worry - I still think you're of equal value to the rest of us.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
For the hard of thinking, I may have to explain myself.
DA and Lisa are arguing that there is no way you can say that people can be of equal worth.
Old Greg is arguing that the very fact that you're human makes it so, as, ironically, the Founding Fathers of the most capitalistic state yet created averred.
So I'm merely demonstrating to Lisa and DA that there are many ways to judge people and that is dangerous to do so.
For example the fact that they are poorly educated might make someone argue that they are of less worth.
HTH. Feck me, you lot are thick. Exterminate! Exterminate!.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Well you don't have a degree. To some, many blue-chip employers, for example, that makes you of less worth than someone with one.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostIt's absolutely amazing the insights that you have. I assume that as, typically, you have made vague allusions without any substantive argument it would be an exercise in futility, on my part, to ask you to provide evidence of a simple or even complex concept that I lack the intellectual capability to understand? Unless what you actually mean is that I hold a different opinion from your own and that is enough for you to label me as being of below average intelligence.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Today 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Yesterday 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22


Comment