Footballers earn too much money therefore there is no incentive for them to play well. What is the point of exerting oneself when all you need is to retire after a one year contract?
-
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Tennis players, formula one drivers and a few track and field athletes earn a tulipload of money too; it doesn't seem to stop them trying.Originally posted by Paddy View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Rugby and Cricket aren't world sports. For the most part they are only played by ex-Empire countries so no huge deal in winning anything there really.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
As for rowing, why not add snooker, dart and crown green bowling to the list?Comment
-
Why not? Those are games where England's competitors win things.Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
Better than those footballists with their 48 years of failure.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
legend amongst the coffin dodgers. we'll not see his like again.
qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
-
not my game, but well done to himOriginally posted by quackhandle View Post...picture of an old bloke that won stuff...
legend amongst the coffin dodgers. we'll not see his like again.
qhAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
/103_0033.JPG)
The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Had to check the name; looks a bit like Will Greenwood but it isn't. (for the uninitiated; he's a chap who won stuff playing rugby for England).Originally posted by speling bee View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
David Bryant innit?Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
legend amongst the coffin dodgers. we'll not see his like again.
qhComment
-
He had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
Comment