Originally posted by CheeseSlice
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
An Attack of the Vapers
Collapse
X
-
can't see any problem with that. It just seems to be the case of start as you mean to go on..merely at clientco for the entertainment -
The problem is that all the reasons that cigarettes were banned (dangers of passive smoking, smoky atmosphere, smell, stingy eyes etc) don't apply to e-cigs.Originally posted by eek View Postcan't see any problem with that. It just seems to be the case of start as you mean to go on..
What's the evidence for banning them?Comment
-
Said Nicotine Nick. Same argument as smokers. No doubt we'll find that eCiggies give you brain cancer in due course and those evil manufacturers should be sued. If I wanted the person on the opposite table to me sucking longingly on a piece of plastic and cooing in pleasure I'd head over to Suitys house for the twice weekly show his wife does for the local truckers.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostIn what way are they "nasty [and] filthy"? The vapour is just that, water vapour. You might as well insist that the chef go outside to steam vegetables.
Just because some stupid morons are whining doesn't mean we should kowtow to them. Tell them to leave, and not come back until they've dragged themselves out of the morass of ignorance in which they currently wallow. They're the kind of people that just love having something to moan about anyway. Gits.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Haters gonna hate.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostIn what way are they "nasty [and] filthy"? The vapour is just that, water vapour. You might as well insist that the chef go outside to steam vegetables.
Just because some stupid morons are whining doesn't mean we should kowtow to them. Tell them to leave, and not come back until they've dragged themselves out of the morass of ignorance in which they currently wallow. They're the kind of people that just love having something to moan about anyway. Gits.
Bansturbators gonna bansturbate.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment