- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Software Room 101
Collapse
X
-
-
If you sell a tool that 'supports multiple projects' then one of the most basic happy flow tests in your regression set must surely be 'verify that an object can be copied from one project to another'?
FFS, HP, get your bleeding act together or get your ******* useless tulipware out of my line of work.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostHere's the one bit of the HP QC saga that makes me giggle;
clientco keeps running out of licenses but they can't just buy one more license, no, HP's policy is to sell licenses in blocks of 25, for which umpty thousand euros are charged. So two weeks ago, clientco's 'Process Improvement Manager', who is a cretin, decided he should 'negotiate' a discount with HP because clientco is a 'major customer'.
I told him that I'd seen one of the world's biggest publishers as well as the US's biggest company trying to negotiate with HP and getting nowhere, so he would be doing very well to get any movement from them at all. I also told him his negotiating position was just about zero, because HP know quite well that clientco has tens of millions of euros of work tied up in QC and an automated migration to another tool is damn near impossible if you don't have the powers of the allegedly omnipotent creator of the universe. Of course, he didn't listen, called up the HP account managerman and 'discussed' the issue. Results; no discount, but HP managed to sell him on site support for a 6 figure sum that he now has to justify to the CTO, who is not impressed, seeing as it would be cheaper to just buy a load more licenses.
How can someone be so naïve? He genuinely thinks that clientco’s use of the full functionality of a tool for very large projects puts him in a good negotiating position! Can he really not see that it’s the other way around? No he can’t because he’s a permie who’s never had to worry about inconveniences like creditors, invoices and so on. But FFS, someone gave him a degree in ’management’!Comment
-
Originally posted by redgiant View Post+1. Seen a similar thing happen with QC licence procurement at large retail clientco. It's quite common for this to happen as it justifies their existence in appearing to negotiate better deals with suppliers where in reality it's the big suppliers that hold all the cards.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How much tax to pay HMRC on cryptocurrency? Jan 16 10:00
- Life Insurance services Jan 15 10:21
- Relevant Life Insurance Services Jan 15 10:08
- Will umbrella company regulation spark mergers and acquisitions? Jan 15 09:24
- Critical Illness Insurance for Contractors: Protect Yourself When It Matters Most Jan 14 16:26
- Relevant Life Insurance for Contractors with a Limited Company Jan 14 16:14
- Life Insurance for Contractors: Why it’s Essential Jan 14 16:09
- Guide to Income Protection Insurance for Contractors Jan 14 16:00
- Treasury minister told six actions can save contractor umbrella sector from ‘existential’ crisis Jan 14 09:40
- Critical Illness Services Jan 13 16:41
Comment