Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
-
that was rather my point some of them are not actually chavvy looking. -
I can't get on that site. Did you stalk her?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostScrubbed up version. I prefer the natural look
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
No, but now I know they are chavs I'm not interested.Originally posted by vetran View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
how do you know they are chavs? many of them are being charged with driving offences.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostComment
-
Well I don't really have time to go through all 118 looking for one or two that are both non-chav and good looking.Originally posted by vetran View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
MP would...Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsOriginally posted by vetranComment
-
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
Sounds interesting, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on5/118 - Danielle Clark - FTA - ANIMAL RUNNING AT LARGE
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Best not to put your finger on her until you know.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostSounds interesting, for reasons I can't quite put my finger onAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Well hello No.8
...what does DUI mean?
And while we're at it, 'animal running at large' WTF?Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
Comment