• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Introducing a new CUK acronym:

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Also I'd like to introduce a complementary acronym : JACT - Just Another Cretinous Thread.
    This is a thread where most of the posts/posters are JACs.
    Hard Brexit now!
    #prayfornodeal

    Comment


      #12
      Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.
        I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:

        JACP - Just another cretinous post
        JACT - Just another cretinous thread
        JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).
        Hard Brexit now!
        #prayfornodeal

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.
          I concur, considering the ability of some posters to contradict themselves in one thread and accidentally say something sensible in one post. Perhaps even sentence level 'jacing' is necessary.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:

            JACP - Just another cretinous post
            JACT - Just another cretinous thread
            JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).
            SAS - King of the cretins
            Doing the needful since 1827

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              . Perhaps even sentence level 'jacing' is necessary.
              Desirable, perhaps, but impractical.
              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
                SAS - King of the cretins
                JACP! Next!
                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                  JACP! Next!
                  It'll just be another 'boy who cried wolf!' situation. We'll become immune, if we're not already, to this.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    I've decided with the current infestation of cretinous imbeciles on CUK that it's not worth wasting my time arguing with all of you (those who are cretins, that is).

                    Therefore if I label a post of yours with this acronym: JAC (Just Another Cretin), this is a handy shortcut for the following:

                    "Your post is ignorant, childish, puerile, lacking in any knowledge of the subject matter, clichéd, downright stupid, vapid, venal or any combinations thereof"

                    HTH
                    JAW
















































                    What happens in General, stays in General.
                    You know what they say about assumptions!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                      JAW

                      JAC off
                      Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X