Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.
I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:
JACP - Just another cretinous post
JACT - Just another cretinous thread
JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).
Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.
I concur, considering the ability of some posters to contradict themselves in one thread and accidentally say something sensible in one post. Perhaps even sentence level 'jacing' is necessary.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:
JACP - Just another cretinous post
JACT - Just another cretinous thread
JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).
I've decided with the current infestation of cretinous imbeciles on CUK that it's not worth wasting my time arguing with all of you (those who are cretins, that is).
Therefore if I label a post of yours with this acronym: JAC (Just Another Cretin), this is a handy shortcut for the following:
"Your post is ignorant, childish, puerile, lacking in any knowledge of the subject matter, clichéd, downright stupid, vapid, venal or any combinations thereof"
Comment