US/UK attack Syria

[cailin maith]

you seriously think the Saudi royal family are any less mad?

His regime is undoubtedly a bad one but it has been clearly exaggerated by the western media to support particular interests and plans.... The guys we should be really worried about are the ones he is fighting.

How do you know that?

[eek]

How do you know that?

Because he is a clueless conspiracy theory loving muppet?

[Mich the Tester]

Because he is a clueless conspiracy theory loving muppet?

Says the muppet cuddling the rubber duck.

[eek]

Says the muppet cuddling the rubber duck.

It takes one to know one.

At which point I rest my case

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

How do you know that?

Because I read various media sources and have done a little bit of research on the topic.

BBC to Guardian to Independent to Russia Today to Al-Jazeera (staunchly anti-asad) to Press TV. All report the media that suites them the best and if you read between the lines you can get somewhere near the truth.....

[proggy]

It doesn't matter if it wasn't Assad, it is unacceptable that the weapon was used, so action needs to be taken. I do believe it was the government and all the evidence points to that so far. I hope we get an intervention like Libya.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

It doesn't matter if it wasn't Assad, it is unacceptable that the weapon was used, so action needs to be taken. I do believe it was the government and all the evidence points to that so far. I hope we get an intervention like Libya.

you are a mad man

[Mich the Tester]

It doesn't matter if it wasn't Assad,

Every time you return to this site you manage to say something so utterly stupid we're all left in suspense as to how you're going to meet your own standards next time around.

[cailin maith]

Because I read various media sources and have done a little bit of research on the topic.

BBC to Guardian to Independent to Russia Today to Al-Jazeera (staunchly anti-asad) to Press TV. All report the media that suites them the best and if you read between the lines you can get somewhere near the truth.....

I think it is spelt Assad.

If he didn't do it or condone (meant authorise) it why not let the UN in to check that he really didn't do it?

You poo poo other people reading what the media says and drawing their own conclusions that Assad did it but you are doing the exact same thing.

If he didn't do it he needs to prove he didn't do it.

Regardless it's a shocker of a tactic.

[eek]

Every time you return to this site you manage to say something so utterly stupid we're all left in suspense as to how you're going to meet your own standards next time around.

on this thread we do, however, have a real competition for stupidest viewpoint.