There is an organisation in the states that tallies the daily media stories and tweets etc that relate to CAGW.
I would have expected slow rises and falls in media stories, with maybe a spike up at conference time, or a spike down during the Olympics etc.
What I would NOT expect, is a step change , and definately not a step change down. That would suggest a systematic seeding of stories that suddenly stopped. But how ? and more importantly why ?
This is the data that shows the step change. And a fine piece of detective work that examines WHY it happened.
I would have expected slow rises and falls in media stories, with maybe a spike up at conference time, or a spike down during the Olympics etc.
What I would NOT expect, is a step change , and definately not a step change down. That would suggest a systematic seeding of stories that suddenly stopped. But how ? and more importantly why ?
This is the data that shows the step change. And a fine piece of detective work that examines WHY it happened.
Comment