Its an interesting situation actually ATW.
I did a contract back in Jan for a two weeks with an agency who charged £450 per day and paid me £325.
Five months later I apply for another role through an another agent who says to me that the company in question(unknown to me) is looking for a permie but because I am local and he has two other contractors in there already he will try and see if they will take a contractor instead.
So he does quite a lot of work persuading the client to take a contractor for a few months instead of a perm and I go an interview for a different PM but in the same company at £350 and 15% commission.
Anyway a few days later the original agency phones up and says he has heard that client have interviewed someone for a contract and would If I send over a new CV he reckons he could get me an interview for £325.
Needless to say, the second agent was of the opinion of 'bollocks to the other agency as it was not him who got the new contract he only heard of it later'.
Anyway the first agent (even though it was 5 months later) reckoned that the new agency should give him the contract or at the least I should pay him 25% per week for the length of the contract.
Yeh. Right.
I did a contract back in Jan for a two weeks with an agency who charged £450 per day and paid me £325.
Five months later I apply for another role through an another agent who says to me that the company in question(unknown to me) is looking for a permie but because I am local and he has two other contractors in there already he will try and see if they will take a contractor instead.
So he does quite a lot of work persuading the client to take a contractor for a few months instead of a perm and I go an interview for a different PM but in the same company at £350 and 15% commission.
Anyway a few days later the original agency phones up and says he has heard that client have interviewed someone for a contract and would If I send over a new CV he reckons he could get me an interview for £325.
Needless to say, the second agent was of the opinion of 'bollocks to the other agency as it was not him who got the new contract he only heard of it later'.
Anyway the first agent (even though it was 5 months later) reckoned that the new agency should give him the contract or at the least I should pay him 25% per week for the length of the contract.
Yeh. Right.
Comment