• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Two LTD Companies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Its an interesting situation actually ATW.

    I did a contract back in Jan for a two weeks with an agency who charged £450 per day and paid me £325.

    Five months later I apply for another role through an another agent who says to me that the company in question(unknown to me) is looking for a permie but because I am local and he has two other contractors in there already he will try and see if they will take a contractor instead.

    So he does quite a lot of work persuading the client to take a contractor for a few months instead of a perm and I go an interview for a different PM but in the same company at £350 and 15% commission.

    Anyway a few days later the original agency phones up and says he has heard that client have interviewed someone for a contract and would If I send over a new CV he reckons he could get me an interview for £325.

    Needless to say, the second agent was of the opinion of 'bollocks to the other agency as it was not him who got the new contract he only heard of it later'.

    Anyway the first agent (even though it was 5 months later) reckoned that the new agency should give him the contract or at the least I should pay him 25% per week for the length of the contract.

    Yeh. Right.
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by MarillionFan
      Anyway the first agent (even though it was 5 months later) reckoned that the new agency should give him the contract or at the least I should pay him 25% per week for the length of the contract.
      Well, in this case I'd tell him to fok off.

      5 months later and another agency dealing with it means that its fair enough - the anti-competitive clause in contract can (if that) only be enforced against person going direct, but you did not go direct in any case and if client agrees with Agency B to accept you then implicitly Agency A can fok off.

      Wise move on 2 companies however, this probably shut the Agent A up quickly.

      P.S. My last contract (and I dont look for many it was just out of the blue - agent found me) was for £350 working 4 days a week from home, agency supposedly was getting 250 per week and tried to get me down to 250 per day (from 300 initially mentioned) initially because it was from home, but I told them counter-suggestion for 350 and they accepted
      Last edited by AtW; 29 July 2006, 16:05.

      Comment


        #23
        Well said atw. And no, it's not just cos that horrid MF person was really nasty to me for not reading the thread properly (sucks thumb). Pity there is not a bit more integrity around. If terms of a contract do not suit, don't agree to them. I suspect that the change of company has not much to do with it really. From what I have heard, these conditions may not really be enforceable and it is rarely attempted, too much hassle and expense for an uncertain result.

        No proper answers, but then, given that the correct legal position on these things could much more easily be established by a google or a query on Uklaw or Computer Weekly , anyone asking on this board is not seriously interested in the best answer, just looking for an argument and a bit of friendly but totally uninformed abuse.

        I often ask things on this board, do I expect a useful answer? Do me a favour.

        PS Overtaken again. 450 and they gave you 325? And other circumstances. Bastards! Contract or no, there is such a thing as an unreasonable margin and unreasonable conditions. Now I agree with you as well! Damn! Oh well, no arguments here then. I must go and hit the missus instead.
        Last edited by xoggoth; 29 July 2006, 16:17.
        bloggoth

        If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
        John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

        Comment


          #24
          Maybe if you didnt type with one finger Xog you might be able to keep up!
          What happens in General, stays in General.
          You know what they say about assumptions!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by xoggoth
            From what I have heard, these conditions may not really be enforceable and it is rarely attempted, too much hassle and expense for an uncertain result.
            Yes I heard so to, generally the main risk of falling foul of these is not having good relationship with the agency, so one has got to weight the risk of not getting possibly good contract in the future against the pleasure to tell them where to go.

            Using 2nd company is smart however, since fighting both would make matters very complicated and in terms of money it simply wont be worth it.

            Comment


              #26
              You're supposed to use your fingers? Damn!
              bloggoth

              If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
              John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

              Comment


                #27
                If your using your little fella Xog - you may struggle to hit the 'any' key (cough according to Mrs Xog).

                Least I have proved it's bigger enough to fill a pram!!!
                What happens in General, stays in General.
                You know what they say about assumptions!

                Comment

                Working...
                X