Oh no!!! The checkout lad at McDonalds is handing out advice!!! Watch those chips ATW they're going to burn!
-
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions! -
Yes but only one to do with contracting. Associated company rules apply when they have same directors or associated directors, eg specified family relationships. It's all on the IR webtulipe.
PS Oh, but that's about CT not legal liabilities. X fails to read thread properly again.
PPS Yes your dahlias wil grow fine in a shady positionLast edited by xoggoth; 29 July 2006, 15:08.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Was this posting about IR. No! So f-ck off.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
You just beat me to my correction stroppy sod. Wasn't you escorted off our site about 6 weeks back was it, for demanding settlement of a technical dispute in the car park?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
No. I havent been escorted off site for at least five months thank you!Originally posted by xoggoth
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
You weren't .. was it? don't make no sense.(It) wasn't you escorted off our site about 6 weeks back was it, for demanding settlement of a technical dispute in the car park?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Are you Welsh?What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Judging by obvious inability of MF to engage in a rational conversation its pretty clear that he was fired from his job for being perversely unyielding person in regards to who should wipe off dust on this desk
Yes its not tax issue here but contractual, however similar situations arisen already and its clear how they were resolved - 2 companies in questions are associated and it can easily be argued that contractual restrictions applied to Company A will pass over to Company B simply because MF is the only or main person owning them as well as actually being the person who provides services.
Its plainly obvious that in this case having 2 companies serves no other purpose than workarounding contractual obligations, and thus the book should be thrown at MF. Of course its purely academical since MFs bluff clearly worked well.Last edited by AtW; 29 July 2006, 15:35.Comment
-
Thank you. Next time do not go
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
I take it you did not lose good nights sleep over effectively reneging on spirit of the contract that you signed? That's no gentleman's behavior MF!
Comment
Comment