Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Lions again
Collapse
X
-
They were for a few mins around half time, I think the Lions showed good spirit and didn't buckle at 16-19. Halfpenny was awesome.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger -
Lions front row was brilliant. Finally we saw a ref that cares about scrummaging and Aus were rightfully torn to shreds.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostThey were for a few mins around half time, I think the Lions showed good spirit and didn't buckle at 16-19. Halfpenny was awesome.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
For me, this was always the way the Lions were going to beat Aus, brawn and grunt all around the park. It was unlikely to be an O'Driscoll (or other) sleight of hand or moment of brilliance in the backline that was going to win the game for them. Continued physicality all around the park and set piece dominance was the way forward which is why I thought they'd win irrespective of whether BOD played or not. Agree re the ref.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostLions front row was brilliant. Finally we saw a ref that cares about scrummaging and Aus were rightfully torn to shreds.Comment
-
Plus three running, passing tries. All in all a good rugby performance I'd say.Originally posted by oracleslave View PostFor me, this was always the way the Lions were going to beat Aus, brawn and grunt all around the park.Comment
-
Why is rugby any different from anything else you seem to have an opinion on?Originally posted by AtW View PostIt might shock some people but I am not actually an expert on rugby so I will not be sharing my views on the lions at this time.
HTH
To be accepted into the upper middle class social circles that your standing as a "nouveau (nearly nouveau to be accurate) riche" entrepreneur requires in modern society will need some basic understanding of:
the rules of rugger
the rules of cricket
One end of a horse from another
when when/when not to tuck your shirt in
how to use something called cutlery
how to sneer at football whilst having your own team to support
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
[pedant]Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhy is rugby any different from anything else you seem to have an opinion on?
To be accepted into the upper middle class social circles that your standing as a "nouveau (nearly nouveau to be accurate) riche" entrepreneur requires in modern society will need some basic understanding of:
the rules of rugger
the rules of cricket
One end of a horse from another
when when/when not to tuck your shirt in
how to use something called cutlery
how to sneer at football whilst having your own team to support


laws
[/pedant]And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Anyway, I shall now state publicly that although I still think BOD should have played, it has been confirmed to me that I don't have a bloody clue what anyone with a shirt number greater than 9 actually does, so in future I shall refrain from saying anything about the selection of backs.
The forwards were bloody brilliant; well done to the backs for not screwing it up. Highlights; Jones, Hibbard and Corbisiero pissing all over Australia's attempt at a front row, a ref who cares about the fine art of scrummaging

and Geoff Parling's diving tap tackle.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
That's only half an admission, I think admin should replace your avatar with a hat or pie for a week and a title saying " I was very wrong Mr Gatland, sorry."Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, I shall now state publicly that although I still think BOD should have played, it has been confirmed to me that I don't have a bloody clue what anyone with a shirt number greater than 9 actually does, so in future I shall refrain from saying anything about the selection of backs.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
I wasn't wrong; BOD could have scored even more.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostThat's only half an admission, I think admin should replace your avatar with a hat or pie for a week and a title saying " I was very wrong Mr Gatland, sorry."
And there's something I just don't like about Gatland; dunno what it is.
Where I was wrong was in assuming that Australia would actually be good.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You forgot to mention Alun Wyn Jones, also immense as captain.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, I shall now state publicly that although I still think BOD should have played, it has been confirmed to me that I don't have a bloody clue what anyone with a shirt number greater than 9 actually does, so in future I shall refrain from saying anything about the selection of backs.
The forwards were bloody brilliant; well done to the backs for not screwing it up. Highlights; Jones, Hibbard and Corbisiero pissing all over Australia's attempt at a front row, a ref who cares about the fine art of scrummaging

and Geoff Parling's diving tap tackle.
Nobody else even in the media seems to have mentioned that tackle by Parling but it was brilliant, and probably a try-saver.
Incidentally, wasn't it Alexander that kept winning penalties off Vinupola? What goes round comes around!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Today 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Yesterday 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55

Comment