• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why the poor don't move

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    A made a slight change for you

    Over the past 200-300 years a lot of jobs have been automated out of existence. New jobs eventually fill their place and overall productivity goes up.
    Overall productivity goes up but utilization may well go down, with the end result being concentration of wealth in the hands of the few, mass unemployment, resentment of the unemployed and social unrest.

    There is an article on the topic in this month's comm. ACM. Not read it yet.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      , we don't have 95% unemployment
      That depends if you count dead wood that's technically "employed" but does nothing useful.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by doodab View Post
        Overall productivity goes up but utilization may well go down, with the end result being concentration of wealth in the hands of the few, mass unemployment, resentment of the unemployed and social unrest.

        There is an article on the topic in this month's comm. ACM. Not read it yet.
        Again, this is something which has happened several times before in history, give it another 30 years and it will happen again
        Coffee's for closers

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          That depends if you count dead wood that's technically "employed" but does nothing useful.
          Dutch statistics; population 17,000,000, working population 7.4 million, of whom about 700,000 are unemployed, another 700,000 on long term sickness benefits, another few hundred thousand (difficult to get precise figures) freelancers with no work, plus about 250,000 people in direct employ of the government. The figures can't carry on adding up.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
            Again, this is something which has happened several times before in history, give it another 30 years and it will happen again
            Yes, but should you tolerate the destruction as it happens? I think the last 100 years should have taught us what mass poverty can cause.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Yes, but should you tolerate the destruction as it happens? I think the last 100 years should have taught us what mass poverty can cause.
              And as a result of past destruction we now have more robust social policies, free healthcare, education and housing which should prevent most people falling into absolute poverty.
              Coffee's for closers

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                And as a result of past destruction we now have more robust social policies, free healthcare, education and housing which should prevent most people falling into absolute poverty.
                But aren't working for huge numbers of people, and indeed entire chunks of the country; you can blame the gummint, the people themselves or the EU or anyone else, but this isn't working and needs improvement because if we think we've seen mass unemployment due to the likes of automated manufacturing and containerised ports, we 'ain't seen nothing yet'.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  That depends if you count dead wood that's technically "employed" but does nothing useful.
                  Like Consular Services for example?

                  “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
                    Like Consular Services for example?

                    Most of them have been outsourced.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
                      And as a result of past destruction we now have more robust social policies, free healthcare, education and housing which should prevent most people falling into absolute poverty.
                      Yes, and the percentage of the population that has to pay for it all does nothing but whinge about it.
                      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X