• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

FIA Tribunal hearing in Paris

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
    It's actually looking tough for the FIA here, they look like chimps. Pirelli have, effectively, stated you have no control over what we do chaps, now be good boys and fook off out of it.

    Brawn: another tactical masterpiece. Would love to see Horners face right now. It's also going to spice up the season, as no one normally 'formally' accuses another team unless they've gone nuclear. You can see this season ending acrimoniously. It's like a soap opera!
    Worse than a soap.
    Mercedes said they regretted the fact that their drivers, Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg, wore anonymous black helmets when driving at the test.
    What next? Hamilton caught wearing the wrong colour of underpants?

    Pathetic. Wouldn't it be nice if the judge were to tell them all to grow up?

    Mind you, the rugby blazers do this kind of thing as well; I remember Manu Tuilagi getting fined for wearing the wrong colour of gumshield instead of a sponsored one.

    This is why I won't do stuff like the rugby club committee; I dont want to turn into one of those idiots.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      This is why I won't do stuff like the rugby club committee; I dont want to turn into one of those idiots.
      If you are really concerned about it then you should stop posting on CUK as well

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        If you are really concerned about it then you should stop posting on CUK as well
        Not THAT concerned.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Worse than a soap.

          What next? Hamilton caught wearing the wrong colour of underpants?
          The implication of them not wearing their normal helmets is that both the tyre manufacturer and the team didn't want anyone to notice that they were using the current driver line-up, in the current car, when in breach of the regulations.

          Every other test that Hamilton has done, he uses his normal race helmet, and everyone knows that it's him. Trying to disguise who the drivers are suggests something to hide.
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
            The implication of them not wearing their normal helmets is that both the tyre manufacturer and the team didn't want anyone to notice that they were using the current driver line-up, in the current car, when in breach of the regulations.

            Every other test that Hamilton has done, he uses his normal race helmet, and everyone knows that it's him. Trying to disguise who the drivers are suggests something to hide.
            Stupid regulations then. Try to restrict the trade of Pirelli and Mercedes and you're bound to end up in court. If FIA wins, two huge companies might just bugger off and find something else to do with their money, so F1 loses. If FIA loses the case, they look ridiculous and F1 loses. Waste of time, the whole thing.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Waste of time, the whole thing.
              It's ze rulez.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                It's ze rulez.
                Same rulez as the IRB, UCI and TCCB (whatever they're called now).

                Regulation 1.i.(a)

                As a sports governing body it is our aim to make a bleeding pain in the arse of ourselves while creaming off the money and handing free tickets to all our mates.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Stupid regulations then. Try to restrict the trade of Pirelli and Mercedes and you're bound to end up in court. If FIA wins, two huge companies might just bugger off and find something else to do with their money, so F1 loses. If FIA loses the case, they look ridiculous and F1 loses. Waste of time, the whole thing.
                  The rules say no out of season testing.

                  The FIA said they could do it, if they told everyone else that they were doing it.

                  They chose to do the test in secret, to the extent that they tried to hide the identity of the people who were driving the cars.

                  They got caught, and Mercedes are now arguing the technicality that the test was nothing to do with them. They have also tried to reel Ferrari into the tribunal because they tested a car that was two years old (allowed by the rules) - the argument being that the 2011 car isn't that much different from the 2013 car.

                  As ever with Ross Brawn, it's whether they can weasel out of being caught yet again.
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                    The rules say no out of season testing.

                    The FIA said they could do it, if they told everyone else that they were doing it.

                    They chose to do the test in secret, to the extent that they tried to hide the identity of the people who were driving the cars.

                    They got caught, and Mercedes are now arguing the technicality that the test was nothing to do with them. They have also tried to reel Ferrari into the tribunal because they tested a car that was two years old (allowed by the rules) - the argument being that the 2011 car isn't that much different from the 2013 car.

                    As ever with Ross Brawn, it's whether they can weasel out of being caught yet again.
                    So they introduced rules that in court either won't stand up, or if they do stand up then two huge companies walk out in a huff and leave F1 starved of tyres, engines and money, which seem to be three essential things for racing cars.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                      The implication of them not wearing their normal helmets is that both the tyre manufacturer and the team didn't want anyone to notice that they were using the current driver line-up, in the current car, when in breach of the regulations.

                      Every other test that Hamilton has done, he uses his normal race helmet, and everyone knows that it's him. Trying to disguise who the drivers are suggests something to hide.
                      It could also imply you didn't want his fans all over the track.

                      I agree, it does look like they were avoiding it, but jesus, it's the most used F1 track in Europe for testing, and F1 cars are not sleepy little doormise; it's not like they headed out to Namibia and held outside windhoek.

                      Pirelli have made me chuckle, I must admit.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X