Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You dont have to have a bad year to buy a car under 1K.
I used to buy similar cars, and run them into the ground for when I was contracting away from home.
The mileage allowance paid for them, and could then afford to run a proper "weekend" motor.
I am going for a Mazda6 this year for under £1,200, It will pay for itself within 6 months.
Good, reliable, and if it breaks down, cheap enough to dump and buy another rather than repair.
You dont have to have a bad year to buy a car under 1K.
I used to buy similar cars, and run them into the ground for when I was contracting away from home.
The mileage allowance paid for them, and could then afford to run a proper "weekend" motor.
I am going for a Mazda6 this year for under £1,200, It will pay for itself within 6 months.
Good, reliable, and if it breaks down, cheap enough to dump and buy another rather than repair.
So what you are saying is you buy a really nice car that you like driving and stick that in a garage to gather dust while losing money. Then you go out and buy a munter and drive that all week when you are statistically more likely to be in a fatal car accident if you travel long distances for work?
Can someone please explain to me why this has ever been a sensible idea?
So what you are saying is you buy a really nice car that you like driving and stick that in a garage to gather dust while losing money. Then you go out and buy a munter and drive that all week when you are statistically more likely to be in a fatal car accident if you travel long distances for work?
Can someone please explain to me why this has ever been a sensible idea?
Because of the increased likelihood that there will be one less agent?
Comment