• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Anyone watching Horizon?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    I know

    its how many times she screams and scratches your back during Dogging.


    This is general its not serious!
    I thought the title "General" meant threads not related to contracting, not "A place where no serious discussion is allowed"?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by doodab View Post

      TBH most of what has already been proved is comprehensible once you reach a certain ability to grasp abstract concepts and you have the necessary background and know what the jargon means. Applying some abstract maths to some little understood aspect of reality, or having the insight required to postulate and prove something as yet unproven, is a different ball game.
      To get to that point you have to make sure you've really "comprehended" by solving the exercises in a "hard" analysis text first.
      I'd settle for that. I haven't solved all in Spivak, but when I do a hard one, it's a high.

      Maybe it's easier if you have a maths degree. My first degree was engineering, when I look at one of my engineering maths books after say, Spivak, they look like a piece of piss. It's all relative I suppose.
      Last edited by sasguru; 5 April 2013, 13:08.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by doodab View Post
        Epsilon-delta was quite early in 'Analysis 1' in the 2nd year.

        TBH most of what has already been proved is comprehensible once you reach a certain ability to grasp abstract concepts and you have the necessary background and know what the jargon means. Applying some abstract maths to some little understood aspect of reality, or having the insight required to postulate and prove something as yet unproven, is a different ball game.
        True, but Sas seemed to be making a big deal of the contrast between "calculus" (limiting tangents etc, as taught at A level) and "analysis" (starting with epsilon-delta, as introduced at the beginning of an undergrad maths course). But obviously there are loads of other aspects of modern analysis, such as measure theory and functional analysis.
        Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          To get to that point you have to make sure you've really "comprehended" by solving the exercises in a "hard" analysis text first.
          I'd settle for that. I haven't solved all in Spivak, but when I do a hard one, it's a high.

          Maybe it's easier if you have a maths degree. My first degree was engineering, when I look at one of my engineering maths books after say, Spivak, they look like a piece of piss. It's all relative I suppose.
          Maybe it depends how you start. I covered Turing's halting problem proof, Godel and Cohen's independence of the continuum hypothesis proofs as part of my course, as well as the usual group theory, analysis and so on. So I did quite a lot of axiomatic prooving, but not so much in the way of application or solving of ODEs, PDEs and so on.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
            True, but Sas seemed to be making a big deal of the contrast between "calculus" (limiting tangents etc, as taught at A level) and "analysis" (starting with epsilon-delta, as introduced at the beginning of an undergrad maths course). .
            That'll be because there's a big contrast
            FFS I didn't have you down as a blowhard.
            Hard Brexit now!
            #prayfornodeal

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by cojak View Post
              Explaining Big Data tonight.

              Fascinating. I wish I was smart enough to be a Quant...
              My son is considering it as a career. It's possible he's even smarter than my real-life persona (as opposed to the thick git I portray here). I might be smart enough for it, but I'm definitely far too lazy. He did Spivak when he was 16. I waited until 2nd year university. It's not really something that's difficult. The topology he's studying now seems rather more challenging.
              Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

              Comment


                #37
                With Math it's good to have a good grasp of both Pure and Applied. Would you prefer a brain surgeon who could talk for hours on the structure of the brain, but hadn't operated or someone with decades of operations but no idea on the theory, or one with both.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                  My son is considering it as a career. It's possible he's even smarter than my real-life persona (as opposed to the thick git I portray here). I might be smart enough for it, but I'm definitely far too lazy. He did Spivak when he was 16. I waited until 2nd year university. It's not really something that's difficult. The topology he's studying now seems rather more challenging.
                  Lots of people "do" Spivak. Very few complete all the problems. Sorry I am a perfectionist and sometimes for me the perfect is the enemy of the excellent.
                  Last edited by sasguru; 5 April 2013, 14:21.
                  Hard Brexit now!
                  #prayfornodeal

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by proggy View Post
                    I thought the title "General" meant threads not related to contracting, not "A place where no serious discussion is allowed"?
                    was a gentle dig, you were starting to sound like an insufferable bore, I don't think "AssGuru Male Gigolo" could stand the competition.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      was a gentle dig, you were starting to sound like an insufferable bore, I don't think "AssGuru Male Gigolo" could stand the competition.
                      I think you're making the classic thicko mistake. What you don't understand is not necessarily boring.
                      HTH
                      Hard Brexit now!
                      #prayfornodeal

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X