Originally posted by Robinho
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
NHS could save billions replacing paper with really expensive machines....
Collapse
X
-
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYeah, sure. So if someone with an infectious disease isn't being treated but is infecting the rest of us, we'll just leave him to it.Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostI appreciate that, but I think it's fair to say that a GP is unlikely to be up to date on the research on every patient's different condition, and, when the patient has gone to the trouble to find some mainstream research that they'd like to discuss, the GP could at least do the courtesy of explaining why she disagrees.
I think the problem is that you can find evidence to support just about any view, but in this case I was trying to find out what the reference range meant, and it's clear that 95% of people have a lower TSH than me. If she doesn't think that getting me to a place where 95% of people are may give me a chance of feeling better, I'd like to understand why. FWIW, if I was in the USA, my values would not be considered normal - they have a much lower upper limit. Things are rarely black and white, and they should be prepared to discuss stuff.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo you thought your 15 minutes of foogling trumps 5 years at medical school, 2 years in hospital wards and a further year as a trainee GP?
Sure.Comment
-
Originally posted by formant View PostAh, so because the GP went through the standard educational path for their profession, as patients we should completely disregard all our physical symptoms once we're told things are fine. Because they're the experts, they must be right. Who are we to question that?
Sure.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo you thought your 15 minutes of foogling trumps 5 years at medical school, 2 years in hospital wards and a further year as a trainee GP?
So far we have a huge organisation that cannot get to appointments all the time, cannot effectively process feeding and regular maintenance properly saying 'Its too complicated mere mortals cannot understand the process'. I hear that all the time. Guess what? most people don't understand their own process and the higher up the tree they are the more arrogant they get about it.
We have had anecdotal evidence that GP's do misdiagnose (in a very serious way) every medical expert I have had take my blood pressure has seemed to be aware of the white coat effect.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostSo you thought your 15 minutes of foogling trumps 5 years at medical school, 2 years in hospital wards and a further year as a trainee GP?
"You need a new boiler, Mr Minestrone. And a hot water tank too"
"Sure, just let me find my check book."Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostIt is cretins like yourself that have seen measles cases spike in the last few years.
The project was using a poorly tested vaccine COMBINATION. By a government that later handled things like Bird Flu vaccines so successfully (we found out that the supplier was a mate of the ministers and most vaccines were useless).
There appeared to be a credible link between evidence of infection probably caused by the vaccine and a debilitating disease that none of the highly qualified medical experts could cure or explain.
Was Dr. Andrew Wakefield Right After All? | Vactruth.com
The response to his objections was to run him out of town and remove the single injections.
Parents panicked and removed their children from the vaccination, private organisations imported incorrect single vaccines and helped the issue, I don't remember these companies later being closed for gross misconduct by BMA / NHS as they should have.
I suspect there is a link between MMR and autism just because they were so desperate to bury it, will it be the 90's Thalidomide scandal?
Will we be burning the bodies in fields as we did with the BSE farce - directly caused by the government.
My children had the MMR jab because the single jabs were made unavailable, they would have had the single jabs if I had the choice.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostNo its failing to deal with public & substantiated challenge by a health professional, who was more highly qualified than most GP's, he put forward what seemed a reasonable argument against what was a cost reduction project.
The project was using a poorly tested vaccine COMBINATION. By a government that later handled things like Bird Flu vaccines so successfully (we found out that the supplier was a mate of the ministers and most vaccines were useless).
There appeared to be a credible link between evidence of infection probably caused by the vaccine and a debilitating disease that none of the highly qualified medical experts could cure or explain.
Was Dr. Andrew Wakefield Right After All? | Vactruth.com
The response to his objections was to run him out of town and remove the single injections.
Parents panicked and removed their children from the vaccination, private organisations imported incorrect single vaccines and helped the issue, I don't remember these companies later being closed for gross misconduct by BMA / NHS as they should have.
I suspect there is a link between MMR and autism just because they were so desperate to bury it, will it be the 90's Thalidomide scandal?
Will we be burning the bodies in fields as we did with the BSE farce - directly caused by the government.
My children had the MMR jab because the single jabs were made unavailable, they would have had the single jabs if I had the choice.
I still cannot believe that people are still arguing that MMR is not safe.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment