Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Kate hoax nurse found dead
Collapse
X
-
-
Why would they fire her? It was an honest mistake. I thought the hospital had said that she wasn't in any trouble as a result of the call?Originally posted by MyUserName View PostHer employers knew who she was and I would be amazed if they did not fire her, anyone with any connection to the hospital or to her would have found out easily enough.
That is without anyone making proper effort etc. This would hardly have stayed anonymous.
Although she might well have been upset by the backlash even if the people concerned probably did not know her exact name.Comment
-
Have you ever heard the expression "Death before dishonour"?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostObviously you missed the salient point. Whatever made this woman kill herself, it was probably mostly due to her terrible life up to that point, so quite why anybody is looking to blame these two DJs for doing something a bit juvenile is beyond me. Why are we not all blaming the NHS for taking better care of nurses, for example?
Speculation of course, but I just don't buy that a normal happy person is so upset by something like this that they kill themselves.
Comment
-
If most of the people on this forum behaved with that much sensitivity towards others there would be very little activity in General.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostYES YES YES, that's why you shouldn't play jokes like that because you don't know who is on the other end. It's not rocket science!Comment
-
But you know what you're joining i.e. you are consenting, again it's not difficult!Originally posted by Bunk View PostIf most of the people on this forum behaved with that much sensitivity towards others there would be very little activity in General.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
Yeah, the warning is on the packet, don't feed them after midnight and don't get 'em wet!Originally posted by Gibbon View PostBut you know what you're joining i.e. you are consenting, again it's not difficult!
Comment
-
Of course they are saying that now otherwise they would be blamed for her suicide, as it is they can stand back and plead innocence whilst the public bay for the blood of these DJs.Originally posted by Bunk View PostWhy would they fire her? It was an honest mistake. I thought the hospital had said that she wasn't in any trouble as a result of the call?
It being an honest mistake is not grounds for not firing someone.
The hospital was a laughing stock and had it's reputation severely tarnished, they would have fired her as it was her fault and if nothing else to 'show how seriously they take this kind of thing' etc.Comment
-
Very good point. However people should know the score before they come on here. Not so if you are working in a hospital -Originally posted by Bunk View PostIf most of the people on this forum behaved with that much sensitivity towards others there would be very little activity in General.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
To be fair we are normally quite civil and polite on here, you f*cktard.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostVery good point. However people should know the score before they come on here. Not so if you are working in a hospital -Comment
-
It was a mistake and the DJs cannot be blamed for her death but they (and othersOriginally posted by MyUserName View PostOf course they are saying that now otherwise they would be blamed for her suicide, as it is they can stand back and plead innocence whilst the public bay for the blood of these DJs.
It being an honest mistake is not grounds for not firing someone.
The hospital was a laughing stock and had it's reputation severely tarnished, they would have fired her as it was her fault and if nothing else to 'show how seriously they take this kind of thing' etc.
) should learn from it.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment