- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Kate hoax nurse found dead
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Kate hoax nurse found dead"
Collapse
-
The call was recorded and then cleared for release by some kind of editorial panel; too juicy not to share I guess. Seems to me this panel are rather more culpable than the presenters, if anyone is.
The radio station is covered by a code of practice that says that such material should only be broadcast after the consent of the 'spoofee' has been gained. The station claimed to have tried to get consent, were unable to, but went ahead regardless. Without that consent the call should not have been broadcast; seems to me that avoiding incidents like this involving vulnerable people is one very good reason why that the code of practice exists.
This particular jape was purile but the prank call, interview or letter has been used to satirical and comic effect - I'm thinking of Chris Morris/Brass Eye, Mark Thomas, The Henry Root letters, even some of Darren Brown's stuff. But no doubt these people do get the appropriate permissions and releases when dealing with 'real' people, who have not chosen to be in the public gaze.Last edited by pjclarke; 10 December 2012, 17:59.
Leave a comment:
-
It was a mistake and the DJs cannot be blamed for her death but they (and othersOriginally posted by MyUserName View PostOf course they are saying that now otherwise they would be blamed for her suicide, as it is they can stand back and plead innocence whilst the public bay for the blood of these DJs.
It being an honest mistake is not grounds for not firing someone.
The hospital was a laughing stock and had it's reputation severely tarnished, they would have fired her as it was her fault and if nothing else to 'show how seriously they take this kind of thing' etc.
) should learn from it.
Leave a comment:
-
To be fair we are normally quite civil and polite on here, you f*cktard.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostVery good point. However people should know the score before they come on here. Not so if you are working in a hospital -
Leave a comment:
-
Very good point. However people should know the score before they come on here. Not so if you are working in a hospital -Originally posted by Bunk View PostIf most of the people on this forum behaved with that much sensitivity towards others there would be very little activity in General.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course they are saying that now otherwise they would be blamed for her suicide, as it is they can stand back and plead innocence whilst the public bay for the blood of these DJs.Originally posted by Bunk View PostWhy would they fire her? It was an honest mistake. I thought the hospital had said that she wasn't in any trouble as a result of the call?
It being an honest mistake is not grounds for not firing someone.
The hospital was a laughing stock and had it's reputation severely tarnished, they would have fired her as it was her fault and if nothing else to 'show how seriously they take this kind of thing' etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, the warning is on the packet, don't feed them after midnight and don't get 'em wet!Originally posted by Gibbon View PostBut you know what you're joining i.e. you are consenting, again it's not difficult!
Leave a comment:
-
If most of the people on this forum behaved with that much sensitivity towards others there would be very little activity in General.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostYES YES YES, that's why you shouldn't play jokes like that because you don't know who is on the other end. It's not rocket science!
Leave a comment:
-
Have you ever heard the expression "Death before dishonour"?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostObviously you missed the salient point. Whatever made this woman kill herself, it was probably mostly due to her terrible life up to that point, so quite why anybody is looking to blame these two DJs for doing something a bit juvenile is beyond me. Why are we not all blaming the NHS for taking better care of nurses, for example?
Speculation of course, but I just don't buy that a normal happy person is so upset by something like this that they kill themselves.
Leave a comment:
-
Why would they fire her? It was an honest mistake. I thought the hospital had said that she wasn't in any trouble as a result of the call?Originally posted by MyUserName View PostHer employers knew who she was and I would be amazed if they did not fire her, anyone with any connection to the hospital or to her would have found out easily enough.
That is without anyone making proper effort etc. This would hardly have stayed anonymous.
Although she might well have been upset by the backlash even if the people concerned probably did not know her exact name.
Leave a comment:
-
If it was then she had serious mental issues.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostTo her being humiliated in this way was probably more serious than a child dying of cancer.
Leave a comment:
-
YES YES YES, that's why you shouldn't play jokes like that because you don't know who is on the other end. It's not rocket science!Originally posted by VectraMan View PostObviously you missed the salient point. Whatever made this woman kill herself, it was probably mostly due to her terrible life up to that point, so quite why anybody is looking to blame these two DJs for doing something a bit juvenile is beyond me. Why are we not all blaming the NHS for taking better care of nurses, for example?
Speculation of course, but I just don't buy that a normal happy person is so upset by something like this that they kill themselves.
Leave a comment:
-
Her employers knew who she was and I would be amazed if they did not fire her, anyone with any connection to the hospital or to her would have found out easily enough.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostDid they or anybody publicise the name of the nurse that made the mistake? Not that I remember.
No happy well-adjusted person kills themselves for a reason as stupid as this.
That is without anyone making proper effort etc. This would hardly have stayed anonymous.
Although she might well have been upset by the backlash even if the people concerned probably did not know her exact name.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41


Leave a comment: