Thank you Kelvin

[pjclarke]

Mackenzie is selling a stupid divisive dishonest pack of lies, it's his stock in trade. Shame on you for buying it and for trying to help him sell it.

[DodgyAgent]

I remember seeing Mackenzie on Question Time a few years ago, when he did another such attack, particularly on Scotland that time. In my prejudice I thought he might get some support from the Cheltnham audience, being as how they would seem to be the good guys in his mythology.

Far from it. The good people of Cheltenham booed him roundly. They didn't just murmur dissent, they booed, and they did it without hesitation. They knew a lot of evil codswallop when they heard it. All credit to them.

I know a lot of evil codswallop when I hear it too. And so should you.

Mackenzie is like O'Leary but much less entertaining: when you're selling crap, no publicity is bad publicity. Mackenzie is selling a stupid divisive dishonest pack of lies, it's his stock in trade. Shame on you for buying it and for trying to help him sell it.

So explain what is evil about what he has to say?

[DodgyAgent]

So explain what is evil about what he has to say?

I didnt think so! In the true fashion of people who cannot argue a point (nearly always lefties) Kelvin Mackenzie is instead smeared as being a nasty piece of work (which maybe he is). If he is such a nasty piece of work and his arguments represent this nastiness then surely dissing them with logically presented counterpoints would be a piece of cake.

[SupremeSpod]

I didnt thinks so! In the true fashion of people who cannot argue a point (nearly always lefties) Kelvin Mackenzie is instead smeared as being a nasty piece of work (which maybe he is). If he is such a nasty piece of work and his arguments represent this nastiness then surely dissing them with logically presented counterpoints would be a piece of cake.

On this forum? I don't think so.

[LatteLiberal]

I didnt thinks so! In the true fashion of people who cannot argue a point (nearly always lefties) Kelvin Mackenzie is instead smeared as being a nasty piece of work (which maybe he is). If he is such a nasty piece of work and his arguments represent this nastiness then surely dissing them with logically presented counterpoints would be a piece of cake.

Apart from all the ones in this thread? He sucks from the Murdoch cock.

[DodgyAgent]

Apart from all the ones in this thread? He sucks from the Murdoch cock.

such as?

[LatteLiberal]

such as?

Read the thread, poster after poster showed his arguments to be what they are. He can only remain in the public eye by offering conversational right wing opinions, bet he has something to sell. Only an utter fool would support any of his bile.

[SupremeSpod]

Read the thread, poster after poster showed his arguments to be what they are. He can only remain in the public eye by offering conversational right wing opinions, bet he has something to sell. Only an utter fool would support any of his bile.

Try the word "controversial" it's more appropriate in this context.

Better still, learn to think before you post.

[d000hg]

I didnt think so! In the true fashion of people who cannot argue a point (nearly always lefties) Kelvin Mackenzie is instead smeared as being a nasty piece of work (which maybe he is). If he is such a nasty piece of work and his arguments represent this nastiness then surely dissing them with logically presented counterpoints would be a piece of cake.

I might as well post that the Jews were behind 9/11 and demand that you post a good counter-argument. Stupid tulip-stirring trolling doesn't require debate.

[DodgyAgent]

Read the thread, poster after poster showed his arguments to be what they are. He can only remain in the public eye by offering conversational right wing opinions, bet he has something to sell. Only an utter fool would support any of his bile.

As I said none of them are arguments they are simply smears about Mackenzie