Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.
Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
Self replicating nanobots.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.
Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
We're probably due some mass extinction event due to the evolutionary over success of Homo Sapiens.
1) Our success is stifling other evolutionary trees (much like the dinosaurs with mammals).
2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger
2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
That should be in the Tory manifesto!
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
You mean the inbreeding is causing the toffs to devolve?
That's a given.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Comment