• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Facing facts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Erm, he's not a robot.

    And, CUK isn't real life....
    It's not real life!!!! As so that's where I've been going wrong!
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Aww bless, are you one of these people who think the internet isn't real?
      Coming from someone who thinks "God" is real, that is funny.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
        Coming from someone who thinks "God" is real, that is funny.
        God is real. She is called Cailin Maith and you had better not forget it.....

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
          What if it was an alien race of 7 foot alien Amazonian women who did the same???
          5' 8" and I'm sure we could evolve some sort of symbiosis similar to the one enjoyed by humans and dairy cows.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
            At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.

            Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
            Self replicating nanobots.
            Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

            Comment


              #26
              Our Final Century: The 50/50 Threat to Humanity's Survival: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty-first Century?: Amazon.co.uk: Martin Rees: Books

              It's in there somewhere.
              Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.

                Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
                We're probably due some mass extinction event due to the evolutionary over success of Homo Sapiens.

                1) Our success is stifling other evolutionary trees (much like the dinosaurs with mammals).

                2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
                But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

                  2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
                  That should be in the Tory manifesto!
                  Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                    That should be in the Tory manifesto!
                    You mean the inbreeding is causing the toffs to devolve?
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by doodab View Post
                      You mean the inbreeding is causing the toffs to devolve?
                      That's a given.
                      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X