• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Facing facts

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Facing facts"

Collapse

  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    You mean the inbreeding is causing the toffs to devolve?
    That's a given.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    That should be in the Tory manifesto!
    You mean the inbreeding is causing the toffs to devolve?

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

    2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
    That should be in the Tory manifesto!

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.

    Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
    We're probably due some mass extinction event due to the evolutionary over success of Homo Sapiens.

    1) Our success is stifling other evolutionary trees (much like the dinosaurs with mammals).

    2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Our Final Century: The 50/50 Threat to Humanity's Survival: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty-first Century?: Amazon.co.uk: Martin Rees: Books

    It's in there somewhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.

    Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
    Self replicating nanobots.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    What if it was an alien race of 7 foot alien Amazonian women who did the same???
    5' 8" and I'm sure we could evolve some sort of symbiosis similar to the one enjoyed by humans and dairy cows.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Coming from someone who thinks "God" is real, that is funny.
    God is real. She is called Cailin Maith and you had better not forget it.....

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Aww bless, are you one of these people who think the internet isn't real?
    Coming from someone who thinks "God" is real, that is funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Erm, he's not a robot.

    And, CUK isn't real life....
    It's not real life!!!! As so that's where I've been going wrong!

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Could we have the robots replace the chavs?
    Why not have the robots blast the chavs with high tech weaponry live on TV? Everyone wins.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Could we have the robots replace the chavs?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.

    Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Aww bless, are you one of these people who think the internet isn't real?
    Of course it's real.

    I just don't want it talking to me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X