Originally posted by doodab
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Facing facts
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Facing facts"
Collapse
-
That should be in the Tory manifesto!Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
Leave a comment:
-
We're probably due some mass extinction event due to the evolutionary over success of Homo Sapiens.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostAt least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.
Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
1) Our success is stifling other evolutionary trees (much like the dinosaurs with mammals).
2) Our own evolution is stifled by the over accommodation of none advancing specimens.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Self replicating nanobots.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostAt least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.
Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
Leave a comment:
-
Coming from someone who thinks "God" is real, that is funny.Originally posted by d000hg View PostAww bless, are you one of these people who think the internet isn't real?
Leave a comment:
-
It's not real life!!!! As so that's where I've been going wrong!Originally posted by cailin maith View PostErm, he's not a robot.
And, CUK isn't real life....
Leave a comment:
-
At least you can generally see rampaging robots. So they'd be far less of a hazard than genetically engineered viruses or bacteria on the loose.
Sooner or later some disastrous release of the latter is almost bound to happen, they way some gung ho scientists carry on, and it wouldn't have to target humans - A virus that only killed grass for example (including rice, wheat, etc) would kill a fair proportion of the Earth's population
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostAww bless, are you one of these people who think the internet isn't real?
Of course it's real.
I just don't want it talking to me.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Leave a comment: