• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Britain stuck with high inflation, meagre growth..

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Do you mean to say you're a happy person that doesn't really worry about the 'value' of your house?
    if a tin of beans cost £5000 and I wanted one, I would have a problem
    but if they would take a tin of tomatoes, why would I worry ?

    the only two times I would concern myself over the 'value', are the first time I had to lay out for one
    and the last time I sold one


    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    Comment


      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
      if a tin of beans cost £5000 and I wanted one, I would have a problem
      but if they would take a tin of tomatoes, why would I worry ?

      the only two times I would concern myself over the 'value', are the first time I had to lay out for one
      and the last time I sold one


      Yep, that's pretty much my attitude.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        That's a big prediction.
        No it isn't.

        But it doesn't matter anyway, i never said buy a house necessarily, that is just a good example of an asset that will be very likely to rise in value. My point was that (effectively) negative interest rates have made taking on a certain level of debt the most sensible course of action.

        Comment


          Originally posted by cailin maith View Post

          I'd much rather live in a comfy home and have lots of nice holidays and trips than a fecking big mansion and no cash to do anything.
          I've experienced both and I think you're right.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            Originally posted by Robinho View Post
            No it isn't.

            But it doesn't matter anyway, i never said buy a house necessarily, that is just a good example of an asset that will be very likely to rise in value. My point was that (effectively) negative interest rates have made taking on a certain level of debt the most sensible course of action.
            No they haven't. They've made saving a less attractive option; that doesn't mean that borrowing has become the best option.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
              CM lost interest ages ago when someone mentioned Jack Bauer ..... oh, that was me was't it

              Seriously though I have been reading it, although not really understanding everything.

              I'd much rather live in a comfy home and have lots of nice holidays and trips than a fecking big mansion and no cash to do anything.


              damn fine words.
              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                I think a lot of you are missing the point, but never mind.

                As long as you are enjoying yourselves that's all that matters.

                If you have no money and no debt you've got nothing to lose. Those with money and those with debt have got the most to lose.

                However, there has never been a better time to be in debt, at the expense of those that aren't. And if you are going to take advantage of that situation, best to load up on a mixture of assets and let those who are working and saving pay for it.


                The prudent are making the feckless rich.

                Comment


                  As saving has become less attractive, I have taken to buying a new car every two years and going on massive holidays and helping the kids pay off their mortgages

                  but I paid all that from savings, not through debt


                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post


                    damn fine words.
                    There are whole sectors of 'the economy' whose business model is based on people like us borrowing tuliploads of money to buy a 'fecking big mansion'. Trouble is, I know more and more people like us who aren't doing that.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      No they haven't. They've made saving a less attractive option; that doesn't mean that borrowing has become the best option.
                      On average, yes it has.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X