Originally posted by stek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Autumn Internationals this weekend
Collapse
X
-
Union. 17 stone fatties that run like tulip off a shovel. The only serious league player I came across was Brad Hepi. Not a big lad; I flattened him. Unfortunately I was yellow carded for a late tackle. He had the ball when I set up for the hit, honest ref, but when we hit the ground someone else had run off with it. Apparently that's called 'ball skills', but I is a union forward so I know nothing of that stuff. Scrum, grunt, fart, maul, grunt, fart, tackle, grunt, fart, clear up ball after some back's dropped it.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Bentos! Hilarious. Loved the Cleckheaton joke. Pigeons that fly upside-down because there's nothing worth tulipting on in Cleck.Originally posted by moggy View PostProper Rugby, Union.
Best after dinner speaker I have had the pleasure of listening to was, John Bentley. Very witty man.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
That's how I console myself. At least I tried.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostTim Rodber, I'd forgotten all about him.
Well, you had a go MTT. I packed up rugger in my teens.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
Sorry, just back from the pub. I think they are removing the 'pause'. Crouch, touch, set! I expect mayhem to start with.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWot? I missed this. Is someone trying something sensible instead of 'crouch - touch - pause - collapse'? or is it something even worse?Keeping calm. Keeping invoicing.Comment
-
It might help in the long run, but I don't see why we don't just build the scrum front row, second row, back row. The hit's perhaps entertaining for people who don't really care about rugby, but it's just shortening players' careers.Originally posted by doomage View PostSorry, just back from the pub. I think they are removing the 'pause'. Crouch, touch, set! I expect mayhem to start with.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Ya know, I was a Union fan, coming from the middle of RL-land but Bolton, with no Rugby interest whatsoever, but one Bommy night I was in Farnworth Cricket club and it was GB vs NZ RL test on telly and it was magical. I did like the RU ruff and tumble and the rucking and mauling but what I saw that night was amazing. Fast ball-to-hand, forwards that were practically sprinters - all fast, bang, bang, bang, try...
I still like my RU, but it does seem a bit lumbering now. Would be interesting to try the RU-RL switch code test again - was it Wigan - Bath?Comment
-
I agree with you there MTT. Hits just introduce an extra element of instability.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIt might help in the long run, but I don't see why we don't just build the scrum front row, second row, back row. The hit's perhaps entertaining for people who don't really care about rugby, but it's just shortening players' careers.Comment
-
Comment
-
Back in the 80s and 90s there were 40+ front rowers playing first class rugby; they could do that on experience because a) the scrum still mattered and b) there wasn't this imbecile 'hit' between the two front rows so their shoulders lasted long enough to enjoy playing for longer.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI agree with you there MTT. Hits just introduce an extra element of instability.
Plus, there were more mauls because you didn't have the 'use it or lose it' when it stood still, and that meant defenders were sucked in instead of waiting in midfield; that way, centres were skilful guys who had a little space to throw a dummy and sidestep a man, instead of being fooking great battering rams that provide the entertainment value of a turd drying in the sun.
It wasn't all better back then; I prefer 7s and the standard of 7s has risen dramatically to the point that there are now young guys earning a living from it and only playing 15s to stay fit in the summer.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment