- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Leave it out, Guv'nor.
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 shut it you slag!Originally posted by zeitghost View PostOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
 
 I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I find it extraordinary that it costs £11M to run a fairly modestly-sized office building. They really need to get onto uSwitch immediately, and not just wait for David Cameron to force their utility suppliers to get them on a better rate.
 
 And if the £11M (plus £50M one-off investment) quoted in the article is even partially accounted for by staff and operations costs (as opposed to just the cost of running the building as suggested) then moving somewhere smaller isn't going to help: they'll still be doing the same things from a smaller space when they get there.
 
 I'd forgotten what a shockingly-wasteful gravy train the Public Sector really is. The way this building is run appears to be a case in point.Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Oh you know so little and think you know so much. New Scotland Yard is an old building unsuitable for its current purpose with various expensive to maintain additions that other buildings just don't have.Originally posted by Gentile View PostI find it extraordinary that it costs £11M to run a fairly modestly-sized office building. They really need to get onto uSwitch immediately, and not just wait for David Cameron to force their utility suppliers to get them on a better rate.
 
 And if the £11M (plus £50M one-off investment) quoted in the article is even partially accounted for by staff and operations costs (as opposed to just the cost of running the building as suggested) then moving somewhere smaller isn't going to help: they'll still be doing the same things from a smaller space when they get there.
 
 I'd forgotten what a shockingly-wasteful gravy train the Public Sector really is. The way this building is run appears to be a case in point.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 ave they got a dungeon, with electrodes and waterboards and stuffOriginally posted by eek View PostOh you know so little and think you know so much. New Scotland Yard is an old building unsuitable for its current purpose with various expensive to maintain additions that other buildings just don't have.
 
 
 
  (\__/) (\__/)
 (>'.'<)
 ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Yes and full body scanners as you go in.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postave they got a dungeon, with electrodes and waterboards and stuff
 
 
 
  merely at clientco for the entertainment merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Gordon Brown started it, by flogging the Site of Bow Street Magistrate's Court!
 
 Maybe they could refurbish and move back into Great Scotland Yard. The buildings look OK to me, and are probably much nicer inside than a load of 1960s tat.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Do enlighten me please, eek. I've only worked for the Police, and been with them through a building move. But maybe you really do know something I don't that could account for a running cost of nearly £1M per month in a way that wouldn't make the average tax payer spit out their tea in disbelief?Originally posted by eek View PostOh you know so little and think you know so much. New Scotland Yard is an old building unsuitable for its current purpose with various expensive to maintain additions that other buildings just don't have.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


 
							
						 
				 
				 
				 
				
Comment