Originally posted by Robinho
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Good time to bug your MP
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
When it's working the other side of the country or sitting on the dole because government policy has stuffed the area you live in it's not much of a choice.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away. -
So the choice is don't take a contract earning 400+ quid a day or go on the dole.
Is there no middle ground?
The reality is... someone more local will take the job, and the employment rate will stay the same. If you feel your locality is stuffed i suggest moving house.Comment
-
They don't, and IR35 has absolutely nothing to do with that anyway.Originally posted by Robinho View PostIn fact i don't see why dividends should command lower tax rates anyway, they should just classify dividend tax as part of your income.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
What do you mean?Originally posted by doodab View PostThey don't, and IR35 has absolutely nothing to do with that anyway.
It allows us to pay ourselves in dividends. I consider that one of the biggest advantages of being outside IR35.
Are you doing that thing where you are nitpicking at my posts because you don't like me again?Comment
-
I mean IR35 is to do with national insurance. There is nothing that says you can't pay yourself in dividends if you are inside IR35, all that happens is that you become due for NI on the "deemed payment", which means that it's treated effectively the same as earned income, as opposed to say dividends from BP shares which don't attract NI.Originally posted by Robinho View PostWhat do you mean?
It allows us to pay ourselves in dividends. I consider that one of the biggest advantages of being outside IR35.
No, I'm doing that thing where I'm disagreeing with you because I think you are wrong. It's nothing personal, I guess you probably feel singled out because you are wrong a lot.Are you doing that thing where you are nitpicking at my posts because you don't like me again?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
That was what i was getting at...Originally posted by doodab View Postwhich means that it's treated effectively the same as earned income
The same should apply for BP shares.Originally posted by Robinho View PostIn fact i don't see why dividends should command lower tax rates anyway, they should just classify dividend tax as part of your income.
I didn't know you could pay yourself divvies inside IR35, however, that's irrelevent to the fundamental argument, so yeah, you are nitpicking as usual.Comment
-
That was what i was getting at...What is the fundamental argument exactly? You said dividends commanded lower tax rates and I just pointed out that they don't, now you seem to be both agreeing with me and complaining that I'm nitpicking.I didn't know you could pay yourself divvies inside IR35, however, that's irrelevent to the fundamental argument, so yeah, you are nitpicking as usual.
How do you mean? That dividend income should be subject to NI? Is this for all investors or just private individuals? What about other forms of income like rental and capital gains?The same should apply for BP shares.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
This would imply there was a period of liking you between the first and second instance of nitpicking. Or am I nitpicking?Originally posted by Robinho View PostAre you doing that thing where you are nitpicking at my posts because you don't like me again?Comment
-
The fundamental point i am making is that your income is your income, and should be taxed in the same way.Originally posted by doodab View PostWhat is the fundamental argument exactly? You said dividends commanded lower tax rates and I just pointed out that they don't, now you seem to be both agreeing with me and complaining that I'm nitpicking.
Additionally, dividends do have lower rates than pure income tax before you consider NI.Comment
-
The same way as what? How about a self employed person? Or a partner in a law firm? I'd argue that it would be fairer if IT contractors and PSC users were subject to the same regimen as these people than the current situation where they become liable both for employees and employers NI, especially if it's a policy goal of the government to encourage a flexible workforce.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe fundamental point i am making is that your income is your income, and should be taxed in the same way.
Not when you factor in that the money distributed as dividends is already subject to corporation tax whereas money distributed as salary isn't.Additionally, dividends do have lower rates than pure income tax before you consider NI.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment