Originally posted by speling bee
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Do you want me in your team?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
On second thoughts, take this, you'll get there quicker Hack.Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
See if you can work it out for yourself. Try explaining it in more detail and that may help.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostOK, please, I am open to the house how that is wrong in any way greg. Go on. All earsThe material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
All ears.
Please explain what is wrong in saying if you were paid in aussie dollars 10 years ago, that this amount is worth more in pounds today, than then.
2002 A$3:1 - $1200 worth £400
2012 A$1.7:1 A$1200 worth £700
or
2002 A$3:1 - £400 worth A$1200
2012 A$1.7:1 £400 worth A$700
All earsComment
-
-
So, if I have this right, you believe a contract negotiated in pounds 10 years ago would be worth more today. For as I see it, 10 years ago, living in Australia, he would have A$1200 a day in his pocket, and today A$700 in his pocket had he negotiated in sterling, as he suggested.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostAll ears.
Please explain what is wrong in saying if you were paid in aussie dollars 10 years ago, that this amount is worth more in pounds today, than then.
2002 A$3:1 - $1200 worth £400
2012 A$1.7:1 A$1200 worth £700
or
2002 A$3:1 - £400 worth A$1200
2012 A$1.7:1 £400 worth A$700
All earsComment
-
Fooks sake. You make AussieLoser look like Einstein. You just don't get it do you? There's a kind of mental illness you have.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostOK, please, I am open to the house how that is wrong in any way greg. Go on. All earsHard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
You make Suity look like a main playah.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostSo, if I have this right, you believe a contract negotiated in pounds 10 years ago would be worth more today. For as I see it, 10 years ago, living in Australia, he would have A$1200 a day in his pocket, and today A$700 in his pocket had he negotiated in sterling, as he suggested.Comment
-
First time in my life, I have heard someone say A$1200 is less than A$700. But hey, we're all human.Originally posted by sasguru View PostFooks sake. You make AussieLoser look like Einstein. You just don't get it do you? There's a kind of mental illness you have.Comment
-
Go through every post in the conversation. Pull them together and try to see where you are going wrong.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostSo, if I have this right, you believe a contract negotiated in pounds 10 years ago would be worth more today. For as I see it, 10 years ago, living in Australia, he would have A$1200 a day in his pocket, and today A$700 in his pocket had he negotiated in sterling, as he suggested.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36


Comment