More Bannings

[BrilloPad]

Right you ****er, I'm going to do the washing up!

So we have 10 minutes to bicker then?

You should try dropping more plates - Mrs admin will never let you wash up again.

[TestMangler]

So we have 10 minutes to bicker then?

You should try dropping more plates - Mrs admin will never let you wash up again.

Dominated by a woman at home, dominated by a 'woman' on his forum.

I'll say my goodbyes now, just in case

[d000hg]

It's not a joke I'm afraid.

Got any real links or are stirring as much as spod and co are about G? (Admin I seriously think such allegations should be chased down, it's not funny either way)

Others have been told to know when to STFU too.

Where's my PM then?

It takes two to 'bicker' has the other party been banned as well in the interests of fairness or is it cos ee is dog like?

Cos spod is able to bicker with most of the rest of CUK at the same time. He's got a whole pack of McCain home fries on his shoulder.

[BrilloPad]

He's got a whole pack of choccie biccies in his cupboard with my name on them

FTFY

[Incognito]

FTFY

I never knew McVities did 'Fat Bastard' biccies

[SimonMac]

Right you ****er, I'm going to do the washing up!

[Spacecadet]

NORKS

[cailin maith]

I can't believe I am going to weigh in on this, especially after yesterday saying we fight our own battles but I really think I need to say this.

Just because Spod has has bad experiences working for and with Jewish people doesn't make him Anti-Semetic. Unfortunatly he's not had any positive experiences and ended up tarring them all with the same brush as it were.

For the record, I've also had bad experiences working for and with Jewish people but I've also had positive experiences and I have some great friends who are Jewish. It just so happens, he doesn't.

I think to label him as anti-semetic simply because there is a "label" available for people who say anything negative about Jewish people, is wrong.

How many times on this forum do people tar groups with the same brush? Bobs for instance.... does that make you lot Anti-Bobetic? No, cos there is no such word.

What about the pikeys, we all tar them with the same brush but I know plenty of travelling families in Ireland who don't deserve it.

How about people with tatoos? you lot are so keen to group anyone with a tatoo as a moron simply because thats what you think but there is no word like anti-tattotic - ok, tattotic sounds absurd but you know what I mean!!

And before I get labeled as Eva Braun again, that simply isn't the case.

I'm just trying to explain to those who don't seem to want to let it go.

And as for the banning..... I think Cojak gave him a good spanking which he may well have enjoyed Perhaps one of the lads should do it next time, he might not like it as much.

[Old Hack]

If you don't post do you actually exist?

Je poste, donc je suis...

[doomage]

I can't believe I am going to weigh in on this, especially after yesterday saying we fight our own battles but I really think I need to say this.

Just because Spod has has bad experiences working for and with Jewish people doesn't make him Anti-Semetic. Unfortunatly he's not had any positive experiences and ended up tarring them all with the same brush as it were.

For the record, I've also had bad experiences working for and with Jewish people but I've also had positive experiences and I have some great friends who are Jewish. It just so happens, he doesn't.

I think to label him as anti-semetic simply because there is a "label" available for people who say anything negative about Jewish people, is wrong.

How many times on this forum do people tar groups with the same brush? Bobs for instance.... does that make you lot Anti-Bobetic? No, cos there is no such word.

What about the pikeys, we all tar them with the same brush but I know plenty of travelling families in Ireland who don't deserve it.

How about people with tatoos? you lot are so keen to group anyone with a tatoo as a moron simply because thats what you think but there is no word like anti-tattotic - ok, tattotic sounds absurd but you know what I mean!!

And before I get labeled as Eva Braun again, that simply isn't the case.

I'm just trying to explain to those who don't seem to want to let it go.

And as for the banning..... I think Cojak gave him a good spanking which he may well have enjoyed Perhaps one of the lads should do it next time, he might not like it as much.

Can we agree that Catholics are fair game? Or at least Aussies?