You could simply hold the other parties 50% interest in trust for them.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Question about mortgages
Collapse
X
-
-
Absolutely - are your sure you want just your name on the debt but both names on the asset? That's asking for trouble. Two guys I know have married a girl only to have her divorce them 1 year later taking half the house. Nasty! 1 girl was found out to have done it 5 times - basically her career was getting married and divorced on 1 year cycles to guys who had some cash. I do believe in Karma - so she must have had a nasty accident coming. Just don't envy whoveer caused it as she'll rinse them for everything! Actually - what would be justice is someone lying to her they were loaded - but in fact they were close to bankrupt and took half her money.Originally posted by Ketchup View PostThat would be very stupid. You would be liable for the whole debt and she would be entitled to half the property. As someone who bought a house with an ex and spent an enourmous amount of money getting the house sold when we broke up as she was being a **** i had to get an order for sale through the courts.
If you buy a house with anyone who you arent married with, get a deed of trust signed by both parties outlining what happens if you break up.
I'm just moving in with my current GF, politely mentioned when I was making the mortgage application she would be moving in. I knew what the outcome would be - mortgage company have given her a form to sign saying she has no rights to the property and can't stay if it gets repossed.
If you want a significant other to stay with you - just say I'll pay for the house and bills - you pay for the holidays and shopping. If things go pear shaped - and you are feeling bad you can always give them a few months rent on the way out the door. Or the phone number for the local council. Or if you think it will work out - tell them to stick an equivalent to half the mortgage in a savings account - untill you next move or pay off a lump sum when you add them to the mortgage in future.Signed sealed and delivered.Comment
-
d00dhg has hit the nail on the head.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostCan you buy a property in joint names on the deeds but only have one name on the mortgage (sole mortgage) or if the property is owned jointly, does the mortgage have to be in joint names?
TIA
Essentially the answer is no. Lenders require all parties to be on the mortgage because in the event of needing to reposesses the property, they wont be able to do so if someone else has joint ownership. A lot of the time, when filling out residential mortgage applications, lenders want to be made aware of all other persons living in the property such as partners and dependents.Comment
-
That was unintentionalOriginally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Postd00dhg has hit the nail on the head.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Comment
-
Haha - Sorry alreadypacked - meant you were spot on.Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post


Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment