• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Lib Dems prove once again they are not fit to govern

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by cykophysh39 View Post
    Yes, and unfortunately you just don't seem to grasp the simple equation.

    1 + 1 = 2
    1 != 2
    I am aware that 1 + 1 = 2 and i am also aware that the number 1 is not equal to the number 2.

    What does this have to do with anything though?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Robinho View Post
      Exactly, profits are increased, that means the thing that was cut was hindering total profits and thus, was unprofitable. If the thing that was cut was profitable, then profits would decrease when it was cut.

      It's pretty basic maths.
      For someone who blathers on about "basic economics" you appear to have surprisingly little grasp of it. You might want to google "oppurtunity cost" in order to understand why something that is profitable might be cut.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        Sit down.

        If resources can be better used elsewhere, then on a company wide level it is still unprofitable.

        There are only a finite amount of resources available.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Robinho View Post
          Sit down.

          If resources can be better used elsewhere, then on a company wide level it is still unprofitable.

          There are only a finite amount of resources available.
          You don't actually know what unprofitable means do you?
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            Originally posted by sasguru View Post

            Given that the banks' motivation for profit has all but bankrupted the whole country, how can you still argue this?
            You really are a prize cretin.
            I am not suggesting they actually do work for the general good. I would rather trust human instinct and self interest to correct and balance social concerns than any liberal do gooder.
            Where companies act against the interests of society it is the governments job to step in - something that our last labour government failed to do.
            I will take Rolls Royce Derby as an example. Here is a company that supports local schools sports clubs and Universities way better than any local government could do. They are driven by a sense of civic pride because it is in their interests to do so. Why because they rely upon Engineers wanting to come and work for them and they rely on Government contracts for business.
            Singapore likewise if you are a company and you want to import Engineers then you must show that you sponsor and support lots of sports and educational establishments and help the locals to either find work or prepare for it.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              Originally posted by doodab View Post
              You don't actually know what unprofitable means do you?
              If the existence of a branch decreases total profits then in isolation it is unprofitable, regardless of whether the actual branch makes a profit or not.

              I have maintained this stance from the beginning.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                If the existence of a branch decreases total profits then in isolation it is unprofitable, regardless of whether the actual branch makes a profit or not.

                I have maintained this stance from the beginning.
                It has little to do with individual branch profitability. If running branches is no longer part of the strategy then they will be sold off or closed down. If we want "sustainability" (leftie cliche) then someone should be encouraged to open a branch to replace the vacuum left assuming the closed Branch was profitable.
                Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                  If the existence of a branch decreases total profits then in isolation it is unprofitable, regardless of whether the actual branch makes a profit or not.

                  I have maintained this stance from the beginning.
                  If the branch makes a profit then by definition it's profitable. I'm not sure why you think being wrong all along makes you less wrong, but it's a good sign that i'm wasting my time.
                  While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    It has little to do with individual branch profitability. If running branches is no longer part of the strategy then they will be sold off or closed down. If we want "sustainability" (leftie cliche) then someone should be encouraged to open a branch to replace the vacuum left assuming the closed Branch was profitable.
                    How about if we want people to be able to access their money so they can spend it and keep the economy ticking over?
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by doodab View Post
                      If the branch makes a profit then by definition it's profitable. I'm not sure why you think being wrong all along makes you less wrong, but it's a good sign that i'm wasting my time.
                      If only as simple as that. The Branch may be profitable but who is it to say that the business can be run without a branch?
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X