• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

cigarette ban for anyone born after 2000

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Tasmania considers cigarette ban for anyone born after 2000 - Telegraph

    Something I have been thinking about for a while - I really hope this is adopted internationally.
    Prohibition didn't work out too well for alcohol when the Yanks gave that a go. And the present worldwide War on Drugs is looking pretty ropey too. I suspect that criminalising nicotine for a whole generation would only have similar results.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      Erm are we talking about smokers tolerating non-smokers or non-smokers tolerating smokers?

      Just asking, like...
      How about smokers tolerate non-smokers not smoking, and non-smokers tolerate smokers smoking?
      Job motivation: how the powerful steal from the stupid.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
        How about smokers tolerate non-smokers not smoking, and non-smokers tolerate smokers smoking?
        Are you suggesting that people should generally whinge about each other a bit less than they do?

        Lunacy. It'll never work you know.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Gentile View Post
          Prohibition didn't work out too well for alcohol when the Yanks gave that a go. And the present worldwide War on Drugs is looking pretty ropey too. I suspect that criminalising nicotine for a whole generation would only have similar results.
          Most people who drink dont want to give up and arent addicted to it.

          Like I said, its tricky. We have an aging population that we cannot afford for them to have a long idle retirement, so why would the government want to make people last even longer? Its totally illogical. They need to encourage extreme sports, smoking, drinking, casual unprotected sex and drugs.

          Comment


            #15
            I can just picture it
            in a few years time, getting stopped on my way into the off licence by a mother and daughter
            young girls says 'hey mister would you get me a litre of white lightning ?'
            EO - 'er.. doesnt your mum object?'
            mum - 'mister, would you get me ten woodbines'




            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Gentile View Post
              the present worldwide War on Drugs is looking pretty ropey too.
              I don't see any evidence it is getting better or worse

              If nicotine(or alcohol) were discovered now it would be banned. But governments are used to the tax revenue now. Which is why cigarettes will not be banned.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                I don't see any evidence it is getting better or worse

                If nicotine(or alcohol) were discovered now it would be banned. But governments are used to the tax revenue now. Which is why cigarettes will not be banned.
                Here's some.

                Just like during alcohol Prohibition, the War on Drugs has caused the mass incarceration of low-level offenders, whilst sending profits for the king pins behind the trade through the roof.

                If you made cigarettes illegal for one generation whilst criminalising it for another older group, you'd find the exact same effect, only in even more starkly ridiculous terms: kids would be ending up in prison for buying twenty fags that their mum and dad could buy perfectly legally.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Gentile View Post
                  Here's some.

                  Just like during alcohol Prohibition, the War on Drugs has caused the mass incarceration of low-level offenders, whilst sending profits for the king pins behind the trade through the roof.

                  If you made cigarettes illegal for one generation whilst criminalising it for another older group, you'd find the exact same effect, only in even more starkly ridiculous terms: kids would be ending up in prison for buying twenty fags that their mum and dad could buy perfectly legally.
                  When the king pins are caught they do get punished.

                  It has always been the way that the rich do okay and the poor suffer - Jesus predicted it. Quite an obvious one really. It is not just drugs.

                  Why do we have to put kids in prison for buying 20 fags? What is wrong with the current rule of fining the shopkeeper?

                  I would like the war on drugs to be consistent.

                  What one has never had one does not miss.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
                    Again what happened to freedom of choice?
                    When did you ever think you had that?
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #20
                      If you want to smoke, smoke, it's your life and you should be able to do as you please. Ideally we'd all have private healthcare so that people who didn't smoke wouldn't have to pay for people that do.

                      I'd legalise a few other drugs too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X