Originally posted by louie
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Louie is a twat!
Collapse
X
-
You mean like these ones?You won't be alerting anyone to anything with a mouthful of mixed seeds. -
Who cares what YOU think a sockie is? That's the same as telling a court "to me it's only murder if they don't deserve it".Originally posted by louie View Postto me sockies are when you create multiple concurrent users pretending to be different people and all interacting
I really don't understand why mods bother banning people when they are happy to let this happen. It just means more new users to validate, etc.I only created new users when the old ones were banned.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
So someone starts a thread slagging ME off, and your gunning for ME to be banned? WTFOriginally posted by d000hg View PostWho cares what YOU think a sockie is? That's the same as telling a court "to me it's only murder if they don't deserve it".
I really don't understand why mods bother banning people when they are happy to let this happen. It just means more new users to validate, etc.Comment
-
Actually I don't think this thread should be allowed because it's just confusing. But I DO think you should be banned - and then they should either ban your real username and stop you creating new ones, or just let you be and stop making jokes of their authority by making meaningless bans.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I have always apologised when I came back, the rules for bannings are not black and white (not that they could be as it's discretionary) and I have crossed the line sometimes. Now I think I have a good grasp of the boundaries and each mods tolerances and I intend to stay within themOriginally posted by d000hg View PostActually I don't think this thread should be allowed because it's just confusing. But I DO think you should be banned - and then they should either ban your real username and stop you creating new ones, or just let you be and stop making jokes of their authority by making meaningless bans.Last edited by louie; 17 August 2012, 10:21.Comment
-
Does that mean you are stayingOriginally posted by louie View PostI have always apologised when I came back, the rules for bannings are not black and white (not that they could be as it's discretionary) and I have crossed the line sometimes. Now I think I have a good grasp of the boundaries and each mods tolerances and I intent to stay withing them
Fiscal nomad it's legal.Comment
-
I give you about a month...Originally posted by louie View Post... Now I think I have a good grasp of the boundaries and each mods tolerances and I intent to stay withing themDown with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Comment
-
How come you keep getting banned then.Originally posted by louie View PostI have always apologised when I came back, the rules for bannings are not black and white (not that they could be as it's discretionary) and I have crossed the line sometimes. Now I think I have a good grasp of the boundaries and each mods tolerances and I intend to stay within them
The whole point of being banned is you apologise after the ban expires, not create a new user to do it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Most of his bans are of the non-expiring variety.Originally posted by d000hg View PostHow come you keep getting banned then.
The whole point of being banned is you apologise after the ban expires, not create a new user to do it.You won't be alerting anyone to anything with a mouthful of mixed seeds.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Yesterday 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Comment