• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Inflation or default?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    The chavs can be used as a cheap source of food for the poor in the meantime.

    Comment


      #12
      A good article I thought, especially this paragraph:

      "Monetarists blame the ECB and the Fed for keeping money too tight in early to mid 2008, pushing a fragile credit system over the edge. They blame “pro-cyclical” regulators for aborting recovery ever since by forcing banks to raise asset ratios too fast. They are right on both counts.

      Yet the `Austrian School’ is surely right as well to argue that a rise in debt ratios across the rich world from 167pc of GDP to 314pc in just thirty years was bound to end badly. There comes a point when extra debt draws down prosperity from the future. The future arrived in 2008."



      I'm a bit miffed that, having never operated unethically with my personal finances, and been debt free, that economic policy seems to be to protect those that have taken more than they can afford - and also the companies too.

      It seems that everyone who lived beyond their means is being helped out of the mess. I don't agree with this, how else will anyone learn?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
        A good article I thought, especially this paragraph:

        "Monetarists blame the ECB and the Fed for keeping money too tight in early to mid 2008, pushing a fragile credit system over the edge. They blame “pro-cyclical” regulators for aborting recovery ever since by forcing banks to raise asset ratios too fast. They are right on both counts.

        Yet the `Austrian School’ is surely right as well to argue that a rise in debt ratios across the rich world from 167pc of GDP to 314pc in just thirty years was bound to end badly. There comes a point when extra debt draws down prosperity from the future. The future arrived in 2008."


        I'm a bit miffed that, having never operated unethically with my personal finances, and been debt free, that economic policy seems to be to protect those that have taken more than they can afford - and also the companies too.

        It seems that everyone who lived beyond their means is being helped out of the mess. I don't agree with this, how else will anyone learn?
        Ambrose is my favourite.

        I'm afraid you made the wrong decision and should have moved into debt a while ago so it can be inflated away.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
          I'm afraid you made the wrong decision and should have moved into debt a while ago so it can be inflated away.
          So now's the time to get a mortgage???

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
            So now's the time to get a mortgage???
            Who knows?

            Comment


              #16
              If you have savings, what IS traditionally the right thing to do with your money when inflation is high relative to interest rates?
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #17
                Quality comment too! ->

                This tendency was particularly pronounced in the British economy, where the City of London exercised enormous power over the boardroom strategies of major companies, and which became overly focused on share price and insufficiently focused on long-term R&D and investment.


                I see this being the same within Government itself , replace shareprice with GDP .

                We need to look at ways to make the UK unique and competitive and invest in a future that's diversified and sustainable.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
                  Quality comment too! ->

                  This tendency was particularly pronounced in the British economy, where the City of London exercised enormous power over the boardroom strategies of major companies, and which became overly focused on share price and insufficiently focused on long-term R&D and investment.


                  I see this being the same within Government itself , replace shareprice with GDP .

                  We need to look at ways to make the UK unique and competitive and invest in a future that's diversified and sustainable.
                  It's simple, you go back to the gold standard and let the market decide the interest rates.

                  Much harder for banks to mess up things when they can't print money with a 0 reserve ratio.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                    It's simple, you go back to the gold standard and let the market decide the interest rates.

                    Much harder for banks to mess up things when they can't print money with a 0 reserve ratio.
                    That is indeed simple.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                      That is indeed simple.
                      Well it won't be simple, only because it will reveal what an absolute state the country is in though. There will be no hiding it with inflation or ridiculous interest rates.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X