• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Now we know who took that Croydon schoolgirl

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Standing by her man???
    Maxine Carr. I had to google it. Soham murders - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Now what she did was wrong. Very wrong. But so is giving her the pitchfork treatment for standing by her man.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
      Maxine Carr. I had to google it. Soham murders - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Now what she did was wrong. Very wrong. But so is giving her the pitchfork treatment for standing by her man.
      Rubbish. There's no mitigation for not shopping someone you know has killed someone in cold blood.

      This case was interesting - parents got 27 months for destroying evidence.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by k2p2 View Post
        Rubbish. There's no mitigation for not shopping someone you know has killed someone in cold blood.

        This case was interesting - parents got 27 months for destroying evidence.
        Agreed. Though in her situation I think it was more a case of standing by someone that she genuinely thought was innocent, but that didn't have an alibi. It must be horrible to find out that someone you loved and trusted was such an evil human being. She should have stopped short of lying for him, though, whether or not she felt he was innocent; it's for the Courts to decide guilt, and lack of an alibi almost certainly wouldn't have been enough to convict him on its own if that had been all that pointed to his guilt.

        Comment


          #74
          Meanwhile, over on the David Icke forums, it seems to be generally accepted that her family is a bit too common for this to be a case of the Illuminati sacrificing their own children. Ergo, it's part of the plan to have us all microchipped.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
            Meanwhile, over on the David Icke forums, it seems to be generally accepted that her family is a bit too common for this to be a case of the Illuminati sacrificing their own children. Ergo, it's part of the plan to have us all microchipped.
            Why isn't David Icke sectioned under the mental health act and in an institution, instead of spouting his paranoid theories on the internet?

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
              Meanwhile, over on the David Icke forums, it seems to be generally accepted that her family is a bit too common for this to be a case of the Illuminati sacrificing their own children. Ergo, it's part of the plan to have us all microchipped.
              oh jesus nick.



              we dont need no Icke. The guy is a fruit loop.

              have you seen the stuff these guys believe ????


              It makes you wonder if there is any sanity left in the world at all.

              Please. No more Icke


              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                oh jesus nick.



                we dont need no Icke. The guy is a fruit loop.

                have you seen the stuff these guys believe ????


                It makes you wonder if there is any sanity left in the world at all.

                Please. No more Icke


                Here is a post from the Icke forum

                "Child disappearance cases - are concealed by the Government!
                Dean Warwick collapsed, and died on stage - after previously speaking on child abductions! It is believed that the UK Government used an ELF (extremely low frequency) device - to silence him! ELF weapons can be set on a Delta wave - to shut down a persons nervous sysytem!
                The UK Government are running scared!"



                Or maybe he had a heart attack? Which is more likely?
                Last edited by louie; 12 August 2012, 19:29.

                Comment


                  #78
                  This lot make us look sane.

                  I don't know about actors and technology, but i would sugest they have done this to herald the advent of their NWO to those conscious of the fact. Even Gabby Logan was mouthing off about a NWO. The number 8 and Tia spelled backwards, in a Satanic manner, is just too much of a coincidece. I mean how many more coincidences are we supposed to believe in.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by louie View Post
                    Here is a post from the Icke forum

                    "Child disappearance cases - are concealed by the Government!
                    Dean Warwick collapsed, and died on stage - after previously speaking on child abductions! It is believed that the UK Government used an ELF (extremely low frequency) device - to silence him! ELF weapons can be set on a Delta wave - to shut down a persons nervous sysytem!
                    The UK Government are running scared!"



                    maybe smoking is a killer after all.

                    they always said it was bad for your elf








                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by louie View Post
                      Why isn't David Icke sectioned under the mental health act and in an institution, instead of spouting his paranoid theories on the internet?
                      Because he knows too much.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X