Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hot breaking news!
Collapse
X
-
-
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Oh my, as a .Net developer stuck up in the backwaters of <modded> I bet you've had cutting edge exposure to the intricacies of the inner war room. Well ain’t we lucky to have Waltrina Mitty here to keep us all abreast of the hush hush deals flowing from Whitehall.Originally posted by Gentile View PostOne of us is naive, certainly. I've worked up close with the FCO and with the Police in this country, so I'm fairly certain that my views are at least informed, whether you happen to like or agree with them or not.
"I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
Ad hominems the best you can come up with to back up your views, incognito? How pathetic and unsurprising.Comment
-
Tappin bought direct from the US to sell onto Iran. There's just a bit of a difference between that and H & K selling a ship load of G-36 to the Saudi MoD which then happens to be put onboard a ship to Istanbul when arriving at Riyadh. Do you see the difference? Do you?Originally posted by Gentile View PostWhat, you mean in the same way that we seem to be able to happily extradite retired British businessmen that export batteries from the US because he's apparently arming Iran by doing so
What you neglect to mention about Tappin was that his buddy did a plea deal with the Us and provided a tulip load of pretty hard evidence that sort of blew his whole 'I only thought they were going to the Netherlands' story out of the water."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
I think EO was making a distinction in the english definition and understanding, rather than a point of law. You would have to ask him though.Originally posted by Gentile View PostTell that to Christopher Tappin.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
But not one of these is from the tabloid press.Originally posted by Incognito View PostYes, no that's right because he hasn't raised the Syria issue at all recently has he.
02 June 2012
10 June 2012
03 July 2012
04 July 2012
17 July 2012
19 July 2012
23 July 2012

Comment
-
You claiming to have a penis now? You ever flew tornados by any chance?Originally posted by Gentile View PostAd hominems the best you can come up with to back up your views, incognito? How pathetic and unsurprising."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
shut it you, and butt outOriginally posted by EternalOptimist View PostI think EO was making a distinction in the english definition and understanding, rather than a point of law. You would have to ask him though.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
And?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostBut not one of these is from the tabloid press.
"I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Today 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Yesterday 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01

Comment