Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Hot breaking news!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Hot breaking news!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostMeanwhile, there's only one fat fantasist chunt on here who is an AndyW wannabe but fails miserably.
Cage fighting with hamsters would be a challenge.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostThe only thing I'm picking up from this thread is that we may have found the the perfect partner for AtW. I mean AtW is a single, 40 year old virgin who likes small furry animals & copies, pastes & takes photos to upload onto the Internet to back up his mad and wild views backed up with pseudo intellectual bollocks. He also spouts technical bollocks.
Sorted.
Cage fighting with hamsters would be a challenge.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostThe only thing I'm picking up from this thread is that we may have found the the perfect partner for AtW. I mean AtW is a single, 40 year old virgin who likes small furry animals & copies, pastes & takes photos to upload onto the Internet to back up his mad and wild views backed up with pseudo intellectual bollocks. He also spouts technical bollocks.
Sorted.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostJust another hurting hun who sees the world and everyone in it against them. Ignore.
Sorted.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostNo, I called you naive because of your opinions. You retorted with the guff that because you've done some dev work with the Old Bill and have once applied for a job with the FCO that you're all of a sudden party to the nation's darkest secrets. That's why you're a Mitty.Originally posted by Gentile View PostI've made no claims other than to not be naive, despite how you've constantly tried to portray me as claiming more than that. And, unlike you, I've supported my opinions with independently-verifiable facts. The inability/unwillingness to recognise that is what makes you immature, and ironically every bit as naive as you claim others to be.
Anyway, I'll leave it there and pop you on my ignore list now, since there's no point having a battle of wits with an unarmed man that's intent only on trading insults in lieu of the wit and wisdom that you lack.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gentile View PostI've made no claims other than to not be naive, despite how you've constantly tried to portray me as claiming more than that.
Originally posted by Gentile View PostOne of us is naive, certainly. I've worked up close with the FCO and with the Police in this country, so I'm fairly certain that my views are at least informed, whether you happen to like or agree with them or not.Originally posted by Gentile View PostI pointed out that I'm not since I've got first-hand experience of both the Police service and the FCO.*
Originally posted by Gentile View PostYou seemed to find that latter hard to believe based on what you think you know about me, so here's a redacted copy of my correspondence with the FCO concerning the position I was offered with them
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostNo, I called you naive because of your opinions. You retorted with the guff that because you've done some dev work with the Old Bill and have once applied for a job with the FCO that you're all of a sudden party to the nation's darkest secrets. That's why you're a Mitty.
Anyway, I'll leave it there and pop you on my ignore list now, since there's no point having a battle of wits with an unarmed man that's intent only on trading insults in lieu of the wit and wisdom that you lack.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gentile View PostNo. It just reveals your hollow claim that I'm somehow "naive" (or ignorant about Whitehall / international relations), merely because I happen to disagree with you, for the uninformed bullshit that it is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostLets be fair - my iron man updates are not constant. At least relative to the counting thread.
And I technical, accounting and business/contracts are for the informed debate. General is for trolling and winding up.
Its been downhill since andyw was released into the wild.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou think because you've had a job offer from the FCO that makes you party to how the big bad world revolves? You've quite clearly demonstrated on this thread you don't if you think that Tappin deliberately circumventing the embargo on Iran is comparable to the Iran-Contra affair. I'll give you a little subject matter to read up on; compare the aims of both parties.
There's a difference between us in that I don't come on here spouting what I've done and what I do thinking it's a nice little shiny badge with which to dazzle the uninformed. At the end of the day you've done some development work with the Police, I'm guessing up North. Wow.
At the end of the day, you've made an arse of yourself by making unfounded accusations and throwing around insults instead of just supporting what you believe with informed argument. The fact that you're not even intelligent or aware enough to admit it when you've been proven wrong is a clear sign that you're immature, as I said earlier.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: