- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Paralympics
Collapse
X
-
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.” -
I think there is some poor journalism here. It doesn't say why he is legally blind. Not all reasons for being legally blind are a disadvantage. He might have hawk like long range vision but can't see his hand in front of his face. He might not have good field of vision but to see a target it isn't required etc... I would love to know exactly what makes him legally blind.Originally posted by darmstadt View Post'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
He could have tunnel vision.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI think there is some poor journalism here. It doesn't say why he is legally blind. Not all reasons for being legally blind are a disadvantage. He might have hawk like long range vision but can't see his hand in front of his face. He might not have good field of vision but to see a target it isn't required etc... I would love to know exactly what makes him legally blind.Comment
-
colour blindOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostI think there is some poor journalism here. It doesn't say why he is legally blind. Not all reasons for being legally blind are a disadvantage. He might have hawk like long range vision but can't see his hand in front of his face. He might not have good field of vision but to see a target it isn't required etc... I would love to know exactly what makes him legally blind.Comment
-
The US an European definition is:Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI think there is some poor journalism here. It doesn't say why he is legally blind. Not all reasons for being legally blind are a disadvantage. He might have hawk like long range vision but can't see his hand in front of his face. He might not have good field of vision but to see a target it isn't required etc... I would love to know exactly what makes him legally blind.
More details on the guy himself here including references to his degree of blindness.Originally posted by WikipediaIn North America and most of Europe, legal blindness is defined as visual acuity (vision) of 20/200 (6/60) or less in the better eye with best correction possible. This means that a legally blind individual would have to stand 20 feet (6.1 m) from an object to see it—with corrective lenses—with the same degree of clarity as a normally sighted person could from 200 feet (61 m). In many areas, people with average acuity who nonetheless have a visual field of less than 20 degrees (the norm being 180 degrees) are also classified as being legally blind. Approximately ten percent of those deemed legally blind, by any measure, have no vision. The rest have some vision, from light perception alone to relatively good acuity. Low vision is sometimes used to describe visual acuities from 20/70 to 20/200.[3]
London 2012 Olympics: legally blind South Korean archer Im Dong-Hyun eyes gold medal at the Games - Telegraph
He has 20/200 vision on one eye and 20/100 in the other, he also shoots without correction ( no glasses or contacts). He would have to stand at 7 meters from the target to get the same clarity as a normal person at 70m."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Well remembered and another reason to have a draconian rule on technology to even out the playing field. It takes away the spirit of the games if one guy can go 10% faster through technology before they have even stepped on the track. They banned those swimsuits that put a layer of bubbles around the swimmer as well but can't remember if it was used to break records first.Originally posted by TheBigD View PostA few years ago Chris Boardman won a track cycling gold riding a custom built bike that was different to every other competitors. After that Olympics they banned it and introduced ruls ensuring all riders were on a level playing field in terms of technology.
I'm surprised they let him in (although I think what he does is pretty cool)
EDIT : Ahh here it is, Phelps did clean the board in one before they got banned..
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/full-...ory?id=9437780'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Yeah it did make them go faster.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWell remembered and another reason to have a draconian rule on technology to even out the playing field. It takes away the spirit of the games if one guy can go 10% faster through technology before they have even stepped on the track. They banned those swimsuits that put a layer of bubbles around the swimmer as well but can't remember if it was used to break records first.
Just reminded me in Wheelchair baskeball they banned Spain as their athletes were not disabled."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
The suits aided buoyancy however the design of the pool also increased the speed and as a result something like 46 WR were broken in that pool.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWell remembered and another reason to have a draconian rule on technology to even out the playing field. It takes away the spirit of the games if one guy can go 10% faster through technology before they have even stepped on the track. They banned those swimsuits that put a layer of bubbles around the swimmer as well but can't remember if it was used to break records first.
EDIT : Ahh here it is, Phelps did clean the board in one before they got banned..
Full Body Swimsuit Now Banned for Swimmers - ABC NewsComment
-
Nice find. Thanks for that. That is indeed quite an achievement by him then.Originally posted by DaveB View PostThe US an European definition is:
More details on the guy himself here including references to his degree of blindness.
He has 20/200 vision on one eye and 20/100 in the other, he also shoots without correction ( no glasses or contacts). He would have to stand at 7 meters from the target to get the same clarity as a normal person at 70m.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
something in the papers today about british swimsuits giving an edge i think..Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWell remembered and another reason to have a draconian rule on technology to even out the playing field. It takes away the spirit of the games if one guy can go 10% faster through technology before they have even stepped on the track. They banned those swimsuits that put a layer of bubbles around the swimmer as well but can't remember if it was used to break records first.
EDIT : Ahh here it is, Phelps did clean the board in one before they got banned..
Full Body Swimsuit Now Banned for Swimmers - ABC NewsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Today 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Yesterday 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57

Comment