• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Hit and run and pass and pass and pass and

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    may get robbed by an elaborate deception.
    I must admit, my first thoughts would be the same. Probably a scam by some Eastern Europeans, to use an innoncent (but complicit) child to make drivers stop and then carjack the vehicles.

    I never used to think like that, but I find as I get older and wiser, every interaction with a stranger must be carefully considered in case it may endanger my life or my property. You can't trust no one !
    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

    C.S. Lewis

    Comment


      #12
      What was an eight year old child doing out at 20:45 anyway? She should have been in bed.

      I'm disgusted and blame the parents.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by The Master
        What was an eight year old child doing out at 20:45 anyway? She should have been in bed.

        I'm disgusted and blame the parents.
        I wasn't going to mention that.
        How many times do we see stories like this where the parent abdicates responsibility. Why did the mother allow the girl to wander off, particularly to cross the road.
        Surely this is endangerment and the parents should be charged!
        Parents should be made to be responsible for their children.
        "We can't watch them all the time" : Then don't have em. (Teenagers excepted).
        I am not qualified to give the above advice!

        The original point and click interface by
        Smith and Wesson.

        Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

        Comment


          #14
          Excuses, excuses, excuses, I would of helped but... It comes down to the fact people can't even accept it is wrong to do nothing.
          I agree with LG. Yes people would know it is wrong had they not been programmed to stay well away from little girls on their own at night.

          Those drivers would of been saying to themselves - "has she been hit by a car ? has she been attacked ? If I get involved I could end up being labelled a paedophile !"

          You see 'child protection' overrides all other considerations, including common sense and common decency.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by BobTheCrate
            I agree with LG. Yes people would know it is wrong had they not been programmed to stay well away from little girls on their own at night.

            Those drivers would of been saying to themselves - "has she been hit by a car ? has she been attacked ? If I get involved I could end up being labelled a paedophile !"

            You see 'child protection' overrides all other considerations, including common sense and common decency.
            I doubt anyone even considered that angle. No it's just selfish barstewards with no morals.
            I remember the good old days of this site when people used to moan about serious contractor related issues like house prices and immigration. How times have changed!?

            Comment


              #16
              In Manchester they would have had her patched up and sat in front of a posse of slavering ambulance-chasers before the gravy had gone cold on their chips!!
              “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by threaded
                After several, not so happy episodes, involving the hopeless UK plod after going in to help in similar circumstance, I'm sorry to say, but I would probably go around too nowadays.
                Oh brilliant!

                So, what you're saying is that you reckon your own convenience is more important than the distress of a badly injured child.

                It's unthinkable that so many failed to stop. What sort of country are we living in now?

                You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                Comment


                  #18
                  I would stop, but not without reservations.

                  About 6 or 7 years ago I stopped in the morning to help a paperboy collapsed in the road. I protected him from traffic with the car, put him in the recovery position, called for an ambulance and stayed with him.

                  When the ambulance arrived, shortly followed by the Police, a detailed description had been given to them of how I had knocked him off his bike by another caller to 999 - no sign of that caller doing anything to help though!

                  Both crews were aggressive towards me and the police were going to arrest me there and then until I pointed out that there was in fact no bike anywhere to be seen, nor any sign whatsoever of bruising or other impact injuries to the boy. That didn't stop them going over the car with a fine toothcomb and searching around for a bike!!!

                  God knows what would have happened to if he had been knocked off his bike by a hit and run driver. Especially if there had been some minor scrape on the car or I had got blood on my hands helping and touched the car front.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by bogeyman
                    Oh brilliant!

                    So, what you're saying is that you reckon your own convenience is more important than the distress of a badly injured child.

                    It's unthinkable that so many failed to stop. What sort of country are we living in now?
                    Once again, and not just to you Bogey, where is the evidence that any of these people "failed to stop" rather than "failed to notice"!
                    I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                    The original point and click interface by
                    Smith and Wesson.

                    Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                    Comment


                      #20
                      As someone once paraphrased, "at least it is newsworthy"

                      Whilst it is newsworthy it is an anomaly. Once this sort of thing doesn't get reported, it is time to worry.

                      Once we start to see stories like "Good samaritan stops to help injured girl until amublance arrives", then we'll know we're in trouble.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X