The point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£750 each to be in the EU
Collapse
X
-
-
Ah, so you made your figures up, but consider your point valid nevertheless.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
So you don't think net contributions aren't flawed also?Comment
-
Comment
-
No i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
So calling someone a cretin without providing any proof constitutes a goal does it?Originally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Who does Robinho remind me of?Comment
-
There are no good papers. Even the Torygraph is for chavs these days.Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
Well if you didn't make the numbers up and they are easy to find, where are they?Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
-
From the man who has an untarnished, unblemished record of being wrongOriginally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Comment
-
Its a fair point - and you get +ve rep for it - even though I suspect you could be one of Sas's sockies.Originally posted by Robinho View PostI know, that's why i said particularly poor, and not just poor.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Comment