The point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£750 each to be in the EU
Collapse
X
-
-
Ah, so you made your figures up, but consider your point valid nevertheless.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
So you don't think net contributions aren't flawed also?Comment
-
Comment
-
No i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
So calling someone a cretin without providing any proof constitutes a goal does it?Originally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Who does Robinho remind me of?Comment
-
There are no good papers. Even the Torygraph is for chavs these days.Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
Well if you didn't make the numbers up and they are easy to find, where are they?Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
-
From the man who has an untarnished, unblemished record of being wrongOriginally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Comment
-
Its a fair point - and you get +ve rep for it - even though I suspect you could be one of Sas's sockies.Originally posted by Robinho View PostI know, that's why i said particularly poor, and not just poor.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment