The point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£750 each to be in the EU
Collapse
X
-
-
Ah, so you made your figures up, but consider your point valid nevertheless.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
So you don't think net contributions aren't flawed also?Comment
-
Comment
-
No i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
So calling someone a cretin without providing any proof constitutes a goal does it?Originally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Who does Robinho remind me of?Comment
-
There are no good papers. Even the Torygraph is for chavs these days.Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
Well if you didn't make the numbers up and they are easy to find, where are they?Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
-
From the man who has an untarnished, unblemished record of being wrongOriginally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Comment
-
Its a fair point - and you get +ve rep for it - even though I suspect you could be one of Sas's sockies.Originally posted by Robinho View PostI know, that's why i said particularly poor, and not just poor.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment