The point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
£750 each to be in the EU
Collapse
X
-
-
Ah, so you made your figures up, but consider your point valid nevertheless.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe point is that the article is only considering gross contributions and not net which is pretty flawed, but make a good headline for easily led simpletons.
So you don't think net contributions aren't flawed also?Comment
-
Comment
-
No i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
So calling someone a cretin without providing any proof constitutes a goal does it?Originally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Who does Robinho remind me of?Comment
-
There are no good papers. Even the Torygraph is for chavs these days.Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
Well if you didn't make the numbers up and they are easy to find, where are they?Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo i didn't make the figures up.
I am against the EU, i just dislike tulip and misleading articles from particularly poor papers.Comment
-
-
From the man who has an untarnished, unblemished record of being wrongOriginally posted by sasguru View PostRobinho 2 - TimberWolf 0.
It's like Spain playing England.
Comment
-
Its a fair point - and you get +ve rep for it - even though I suspect you could be one of Sas's sockies.Originally posted by Robinho View PostI know, that's why i said particularly poor, and not just poor.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Today 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Yesterday 00:23
- ‘Stable’ IT contractor demand moved near growth in February 2026 Mar 10 06:49
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Mar 9 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59

Comment