Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Facebook shares
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
There are plenty of websites that generate income via advertising alone, Googles income is still 96% advertising generated, facebook's problem is more people are using mobile devices where adverts are not shownOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten. -
Most successful if you already had shares and offloaded them straight away at a ridiculous premium.Originally posted by d000hg View PostBlinked and it fell from $32.30 to $31.
Least successful IPO ever?Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
That didn't take long
Facebook IPO plunge sparks tidal wave of lawsuits
Oops.Investors in Facebook's IPO are not taking the stock's drubbing lying down and have launched lawsuits against the social network, its underwriters and NASDAQ, while regulators probe the way the debut was handled.
Investor Darryl Lazar has filed a class action suit against Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, the network's early backers and the banks that helped it onto the market, including Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch, among others, alleging that they failed to be upfront about the prospects for the business.
The suit stems from claims that Morgan Stanley and other banks that were underwriting the initial stock sale decided that their revenue estimates for Facebook were a bit generous and cut them, but only told their large investor clients, not the general public.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Its main raison d'etre is to connect people. If you start charging for that very service, then it's an issue. That's exactly what I mean. I don't mean paying extra to keep adverts off, or for playing games, I mean for its main functionality, which is what they are doing. Just like ebay, which I believe was wrong too. Advertise somehing for sale, pay more, get a bigger heading, pay more get a bigger, bigger, heading. Pay more get a page,etc... I don't use ebay for this too, and of some others, but I digress.Originally posted by d000hg View PostAnd exactly as I said, these are additional purchases. Paying to highlight a post like how you can pay extra to highlight an eBay auction.
A free service with paid premium membership and/or optional add-ons is the very foundation of web-based businesses.
People will not pay to post.Comment
-
Bono has used his $1.5 billion to put an end to poverty, drought and famine in Farmville.Originally posted by Alf W View PostHow much has Bono lost in the last few minutes?Comment
-
He soon shut up when the PIRA threatened to burn down his hotel!Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostBono has used his $1.5 billion to put an end to poverty, drought and famine in Farmville.
Comment
-
Oh does it make me chuckle when billionaire Bono asks me to pay to help end poverty. It will also help me explain irony to my kids.
Comment
-
How many times - they are never going to make you pay for the core service. I don't know where you got that from. Testing paid posts is an optional extra for special announcements, which is only being trialed to start with. That trial is charging something like $2 a pop so it's clearly not targeted at normal users who post dozens of times a day. Most likely it'll be used purely by advertisers.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostIts main raison d'etre is to connect people. If you start charging for that very service, then it's an issue. That's exactly what I mean. I don't mean paying extra to keep adverts off, or for playing games, I mean for its main functionality, which is what they are doing. Just like ebay, which I believe was wrong too. Advertise somehing for sale, pay more, get a bigger heading, pay more get a bigger, bigger, heading. Pay more get a page,etc... I don't use ebay for this too, and of some others, but I digress.
People will not pay to post.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
You simply can't say it will never happen, especially if they are already trialling it. I'd love to have your sense of well being, and optimism, but I am cynical, deeply so, and believe it's just the start. How on earth, otherwise, can they justify a 1bn business be worth 100bn?Originally posted by d000hg View PostHow many times - they are never going to make you pay for the core service. I don't know where you got that from. Testing paid posts is an optional extra for special announcements, which is only being trialed to start with. That trial is charging something like $2 a pop so it's clearly not targeted at normal users who post dozens of times a day. Most likely it'll be used purely by advertisers.
Seriously, I'll stand back from suggesting you're being niave, but surely you can see the path can't you? Or do you think that's it? I think it's the thin edge of the wedge. I'll bookmark the post too.
The trial includes posts from 25p, 50p and 1.25. I can see it now, jeez, lets everyone know I am engaged - £1, that'll highlight it on everyones feeds. Surely, you can see it?
I think it's simply the start of things to come.Comment
-
They're not. As d000hg said, it's a premium service they're trialling, paying to promote a post (something you can already do in Twitter).Originally posted by Old Hack View PostYou simply can't say it will never happen, especially if they are already trialling it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Yesterday 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11

Comment