• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

On a Calendrical theme

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    Calendar Reform in England, 1752

    So, prior to 1752, March 24th 1700 was followed by March 25th 1701.
    Good times for contractors in 1700. Good times for thee indeed.
    Keeping calm. Keeping invoicing.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
      I ain't got a clue. But I do know that insulting posters is not allowed there. Whereas in general it is complusary.
      Whatever it's about, they take it very seriously.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
        Calendar Reform in England, 1752

        So, prior to 1752, March 24th 1700 was followed by March 25th 1701.

        How very odd.

        I never knew that.

        Knew about the 11 stolen days that made April 6th more significant than March 25th.

        So some chappie (as an example in the site above) was in gaol in January 1642 for an offence committed in October 1642.

        How unutterably peculiar.
        I've often wondered how the tax year ended up with the 5th/6th April thing. Now I know.

        Weird. Coincidentally some chap I looked up on Wiki yesterday had a birth date as 1929/30, but I assumed that was just because they had lost the records.

        A bit more on the 11 stolen days and how it affected the Catholic or Protestant areas, with Greece finally catching up in 1923:

        The Gregorian calendar

        Also, don't miss the famous Software Problem Report (SPR) response to a question about 2000 being a leap year:

        PROBLEM: The LIB$DAY Run-Time Library service "incorrectly" assumes the year 2000 is a leap year.
        Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

        Comment

        Working...
        X