• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Payday loans may outstrip credit cards

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Notascooby View Post
    Sweeeeeping generalisation.

    You'll find that drug addicts are unlikely to have the cheque books in the first place and are more likely to turn to bog standard crime. Easier to mug someone than go to cash convertors.

    Its desperate people turning to what they think is there last option that drives this and the sad fact then when caught in a debt spiral, without outisde assistance there is little escape.
    You don't have to be a drug addict to buy drugs and are you saying people who work don't dabble in drugs?
    In Scooter we trust

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
      You don't have to be a drug addict to buy drugs and are you saying people who work don't dabble in drugs?
      I'm saying they'd more likely use their income to pay for these. If you "dabble" then you're less likely to sell the telly to pay for smack.
      Anti-bedwetting advice

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
        It's always been around 'on tic', 'the never never', 'HP'. It's nothing new.
        Exactly, its always been around but the problem now is the consumer society we live in where people feel their hard done by if they don't have the 42" telly or an Iphone, there will always be genuine hardship cases but alot of them are only funding a lifestyle beyond their means, when you walking past one of these places check out the people inside £100 bench jeans, £400 I phones £90 superdry jackets, that to me is not a genuine need and these kinds of places only fuel the circle of debt their already in

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Support Monkey View Post
          Exactly, its always been around but the problem now is the consumer society we live in where people feel their hard done by if they don't have the 42" telly or an Iphone, there will always be genuine hardship cases but alot of them are only funding a lifestyle beyond their means, when you walking past one of these places check out the people inside £100 bench jeans, £400 I phones £90 superdry jackets, that to me is not a genuine need and these kinds of places only fuel the circle of debt their already in
          You seem to be under the impression that these people can't afford these items when actually they can. Due to their circumstances they may end up paying more for them, but if they have budgeted properly they can afford them. It's expensive being poor! (T.V. Smith)
          Just saying like.

          where there's chaos, there's cash !

          I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

          Lowering the tone since 1963

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
            You seem to be under the impression that these people can't afford these items when actually they can. Due to their circumstances they may end up paying more for them, but if they have budgeted properly they can afford them. It's expensive being poor! (T.V. Smith)
            Surely if they budgeted properly they would not need a loan to cover them from one payday to the next.

            budgeting is knowing what is coming in and spending it wisely and making it last until you get payed again even if that means going without

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Notascooby View Post
              I'm saying they'd more likely use their income to pay for these. If you "dabble" then you're less likely to sell the telly to pay for smack.
              They would yes but when you need to get some you can't always wait for payday so why not use a payday loan?
              In Scooter we trust

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                Good luck starving, then. Bankruptcy won't put food on your table or pay your electricity bill.

                Your comment was as per usual nonsensical.
                People starve in Africa everyday I don't see them queuing at pay day loans with cheque in hand. Have you ever been to a developing country? I'm guessing not or you would not use the term starving so loosely. It's particularly insulting to suggest people are starving because of financial reasons when we've on the verge of an obesity epidemic.

                We have a benefits system in place to see that welfare is maintained.

                Why would anyone use payday loans when facilities are in place to provide us with basic needs?
                "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                  People starve in Africa everyday I don't see them queuing at pay day loans with cheque in hand. Have you ever been to a developing country? I'm guessing not or you would not use the term starving so loosely. It's particularly insulting to suggest people are starving because of financial reasons when we've on the verge of an obesity epidemic.

                  We have a benefits system in place to see that welfare is maintained.

                  Why would anyone use payday loans when facilities are in place to provide us with basic needs?
                  We have this problem because, people spend benefit money for booze and tobacco, and then use these quick credit to pay for food. I remember there was a thread about bbc link regarding someone on reduced benefit, spending 10% of his money on these stuff. Unless people at the bottom do not get their priorities right, these sort of companies will do exist.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    That would be 'Raymond' discussed on this board last week.

                    would like to see a cap on APR say 30% so borrow £100 and it costs £130 max in a year. Plus better regulation.
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      That would be 'Raymond' discussed on this board last week.

                      would like to see a cap on APR say 30% so borrow £100 and it costs £130 max in a year. Plus better regulation.
                      The problem with this is no one would want their £100 logged with someone with a bad history for a year just for 30% return, and £100 at 30% max APR would be roughly only £2.5 a month, so not a financially viable solution.

                      +1 for Better regulation though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X